Bibliographic citations
Ortiz, K., (2024). La importancia de la aplicación del control judicial de constitucionalidad para el reconocimiento del matrimonio igualitario en el Perú [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27263
Ortiz, K., La importancia de la aplicación del control judicial de constitucionalidad para el reconocimiento del matrimonio igualitario en el Perú [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27263
@misc{renati/25480,
title = "La importancia de la aplicación del control judicial de constitucionalidad para el reconocimiento del matrimonio igualitario en el Perú",
author = "Ortiz Cornejo, Katherine Lisseth",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
As is well known, the LGBTIQ+ population has been historically and structurally discriminated against in our country. For this reason, this investigation arose in response to the recent rulings issued by the Constitutional Court on the recognition of equal marriage in Peru (Óscar Ugarteche, Andree Martinot and Susel Paredes cases) and the lack of parliamentary deliberation on said matter. For this reason, the objective is to support the theory that the Constitutional Court is empowered to carry out a strong control of constitutionality —even more so if it is faced with a population in a particularly vulnerable situation— which allows the recognition of the equal marriage in Peru. Hence, through this academic work, it is proposed to carry out an analysis of the different legal strategies used by the Constitutional Courts of comparative law (United States, Colombia and Ecuador), regarding the recognition of equal marriage. As well as, a study that contrasts the sentences issued by the Judiciary —in the first instance— and the Constitutional Court, corresponding to the aforementioned matter. Finally, each of the arguments will be presented for which the author considers that the Waldronian thesis —contrary to judicial review— is not applicable in the Peruvian case.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License