Bibliographic citations
Pocohuanca, J., Ccallo, Y. (2020). El ejercicio del derecho de sufragio de los internos procesados con prisión preventiva en el Establecimiento Penitenciario de Sicuani de la provincia de Canchis, región Cusco [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3764
Pocohuanca, J., Ccallo, Y. El ejercicio del derecho de sufragio de los internos procesados con prisión preventiva en el Establecimiento Penitenciario de Sicuani de la provincia de Canchis, región Cusco [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3764
@misc{renati/25070,
title = "El ejercicio del derecho de sufragio de los internos procesados con prisión preventiva en el Establecimiento Penitenciario de Sicuani de la provincia de Canchis, región Cusco",
author = "Ccallo Huirse, Yobana",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2020"
}
Our country is not alien to the subject that was discussed in the present investigation, to speak about the right to suffrage is to refer to one of the many rights that every citizen without impediment has within a society, to speak of the accused who are under preventive detention waiting for a sentence we consider that they are citizens as well, but with an impediment on their ambulatory freedom because of a process, this is how the present investigation consists of V Chapters and was developed in the following way: In the first chapter the research problem is addressed, and the objectives are explained, the reasons in which it justifies, and the delimitation. In the second chapter the theoretical framework is developed, the background of the investigation, within the theoretical bases it was possible to realize aspects on the citizen participation, suspension or loss of the citizenship, right to the suffrage, restrictions, the negation of the right to the suffrage, the vote, loss of liberty, preventive detention, pretrial detention. The criteria used to impose preventive detention. Finally, in the third chapter, the methodology on which the present investigation was developed was established and finally, within the fourth and fifth chapters, the results and sources of information through which the present investigation was carried out were determined. In the Province of Canchis as well as in the different prisons at the national level there is a sector of citizens who are interned in the different penitentiary establishments, the same who are being held awaiting a sentence, in some according to the circumstances the ministry public request its extension at the end of this, as well as surely many of the inmates do not get sentenced is that the situation of many inmates, that is, they can not pay because as long as there is no final judgment every citizen is considered innocent and therefore their rights are intact, and that is why in many European countries, Latin Americans inmates without sentence can pay as in the case of Colombia or Argentina among others. And we are sure that this right at some point in history will be objective, as long as there are no sociopolitical interests, according to the experts' opinions the only way that this right to vote becomes positive is a firm political decision as a way of inclusion of inmates with precautionary measure, our constitution, as well as international standards regulate the right and duty to elect and be elected. We consider that it is an advance that in recent times is taking some initiative in this matter a clear example is the initiative put forward by the national election jury where the right to suffrage of inmates with preventive detention, but As we said above, these are questions of policy where the indifference of the congress to deal with issues that consecrate rights become less effective, which is why this right is postponed. The truth is that currently the defendants with preventive detention do not pay in the elective elections although they still have the status of citizens who are not legally restricted by that right, the constitution establishes when citizenship is lost, as well as the norm The Constitution establishes that any act that prohibits or limits the citizen's exercise of their rights is null and punishable. For what we consider that preventive detention must have a certain limit so it can not restrict rights such as suffrage, the state must implement the means for this right to be enforced and thus be able to involve even a citizen in preventive detention in the democratic life of the country.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.