Citas bibligráficas
Esta es una referencia generada automáticamente. Modifíquela de ser necesario
Tamata, K., (2021). La vulneración del derecho del acreedor hipotecario preferente frente al remate judicial por embargo [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4470
Tamata, K., La vulneración del derecho del acreedor hipotecario preferente frente al remate judicial por embargo []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4470
@misc{renati/24984,
title = "La vulneración del derecho del acreedor hipotecario preferente frente al remate judicial por embargo",
author = "Tamata Rojas, Kelly Paola",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2021"
}
Título: La vulneración del derecho del acreedor hipotecario preferente frente al remate judicial por embargo
Autor(es): Tamata Rojas, Kelly Paola
Asesor(es): Estrada Herrera, Vladimir Iván
Palabras clave: Acreedor hipotecario; Embargo; Remate judicial
Campo OCDE: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Fecha de publicación: 22-sep-2021
Institución: Universidad Andina del Cusco
Resumen: La presente tesis, titulada “La vulneración del derecho del acreedor hipotecario
preferente frente al remate judicial por embargo”; surge a consecuencia de los problemas que
se vienen suscitando en la praxis, problemas que afectan el derecho del acreedor hipotecario
preferente; ya que como veremos a lo largo de la investigación, existen casos en los que las
hipotecas que si bien reportan de seguridad al acreedor hipotecario, están siendo afectadas, pues
en vía nacional sean permitido remates judiciales de bienes inmuebles (productos de embargos)
que poseen una hipoteca anterior, donde el acreedor hipotecario no toma conocimiento de ello, si
no hasta después del remate, puesto que dicho proceso se inicia en otro juzgado y distrito judicial,
procesos en los cuales no notifican al acreedor de rango preferente.
En ese sentido, el presente proyecto pretende demostrar la existencia de la vulneración del derecho
del acreedor hipotecario, y además proponer una posible alternativa de solución, para así evitar
que se haga infructuosa la efectividad del ejercicio del derecho del acreedor hipotecario.
Es por esto que, la problemática del presente estudio merece ser abordada, ya que existe una clara
vulneración al derecho del acreedor hipotecario, al no notificar, proteger ni respetar el derecho de
rango preferente.
The present thesis, entitled “The violation of the right of the preferential mortgage creditor against the judicial auction by seizure“; It arises as a result of the problems that have arisen in the practice, problems that affect the right of the preferred mortgagee; Since, as we will see throughout the investigation, there are cases in which mortgages that, although they report security to the mortgagee, are being harmed, since judicial auctions of real estate (seizure products) that they own are allowed nationally. a previous mortgage, where the mortgagee does not become aware of it, if not until after the auction, since said process begins in another court and judicial district, processes in which the creditor of preferential rank is not notified. In this sense, this project aims to demonstrate the existence of the infringement of the right of the mortgagee, and also to propose a possible alternative solution, in order to avoid making the effectiveness of the exercise of the right of the mortgagee unsuccessful. This is why the problem of this investigation deserves to be addressed, since there is a clear violation of the right of the mortgagee, by not notifying, protecting or respecting the right of preferential rank.
The present thesis, entitled “The violation of the right of the preferential mortgage creditor against the judicial auction by seizure“; It arises as a result of the problems that have arisen in the practice, problems that affect the right of the preferred mortgagee; Since, as we will see throughout the investigation, there are cases in which mortgages that, although they report security to the mortgagee, are being harmed, since judicial auctions of real estate (seizure products) that they own are allowed nationally. a previous mortgage, where the mortgagee does not become aware of it, if not until after the auction, since said process begins in another court and judicial district, processes in which the creditor of preferential rank is not notified. In this sense, this project aims to demonstrate the existence of the infringement of the right of the mortgagee, and also to propose a possible alternative solution, in order to avoid making the effectiveness of the exercise of the right of the mortgagee unsuccessful. This is why the problem of this investigation deserves to be addressed, since there is a clear violation of the right of the mortgagee, by not notifying, protecting or respecting the right of preferential rank.
Enlace al repositorio: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/4470
Disciplina académico-profesional: Derecho
Institución que otorga el grado o título: Universidad Andina del Cusco. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencia Política
Grado o título: Abogada
Jurado: Zuniga Mojonero, Fredy; Delgado Otazú, Ericson; Olivares Torre, Gretel Roxana; Cosio Muñoz, Juan
Fecha de registro: 28-mar-2022
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons