Bibliographic citations
Santillan, L., (2022). Modelación hidrológica e hidráulica del Río Chalaco, para el diseño de Puente Chalaco, cuenca Medio Alto Piura [Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5662
Santillan, L., Modelación hidrológica e hidráulica del Río Chalaco, para el diseño de Puente Chalaco, cuenca Medio Alto Piura []. PE: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/5662
@misc{renati/246457,
title = "Modelación hidrológica e hidráulica del Río Chalaco, para el diseño de Puente Chalaco, cuenca Medio Alto Piura",
author = "Santillan Mullisaca, Lucrecia Yolanda",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2022"
}
The purpose of this paper is to present the procedures carried out to obtain the máximum flood flow by means of hydrological modeling in the Chalaco river basin and subsequent one-dimensional hydraulic modeling of the river in the Chalaco bridge section, which presents structural damage caused by El Niño Costero in 2017. The physiographic characteristics of the basin were determined by obtaining geomorphological parameters and estimating the Curve Number. Subsequently, the maximum 24-hour precipitation record of the Chalaco station was analyzed through the analysis of doubtful data (Water Resources Council Method); frequency analysis by the Smirnov Kolmogorov method, being the Gumbel distribution that best fit the data; determination of IDF curve and the estimation of design hyetogram. For the hydrological modeling, the Snyder's Synthetic Hydrograph method was applied, which allowed estimating the design flow for a return period of 175 years. The hydraulic modeling was carried out with Hec-ras software, where a one-dimensional model was applied to estimate the hydraulic dimensions of the riverbed. For this purpose, topographic information was available upstream and downstream of the Chalaco bridge. For the calibration of both models, the maximum footprint observed in the existing bridge abutment was considered. Finally, the hydraulic dimensions of the projected bridge were determined for a maximum flow of 621.70 m3/s with an estimated NAME of 223.92 m.a.s.l. ahead of 2.18m and a gauge height of 2.5m. The estimated hydraulic span was 70m.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License