Citas bibligráficas
Rivera, L., (2015). Rendimiento del cultivo de camote INIA 320 aplicando el riego por goteo convencional e intermitente [Tesis, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/1842
Rivera, L., Rendimiento del cultivo de camote INIA 320 aplicando el riego por goteo convencional e intermitente [Tesis]. : Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/1842
@misc{renati/245795,
title = "Rendimiento del cultivo de camote INIA 320 aplicando el riego por goteo convencional e intermitente",
author = "Rivera Serna, Liz Greca",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2015"
}
This research aimed to compare the performance of INIA 320 sweetpotato by applying a conventional and intermittent irrigation using drip irrigation tape. Fieldwork was conducted in a demostration paree! of Water Resources Department (HRD), inside the Faculty of Agricultura! Engineering at the University National Agraria La Molina, between the months ofFebruary ~o July 2015. The experimental field had an area of 248 m2. -1 worked with two treatments and both used a drip irrigation system, the irrigation depth satisfied 100% of the crop water needs. Both treatments had the same amount of area and the same number of plants, 1 worked with a completely randomized design with two treatments and each one with six repetitions. According to the results, It concludes that the amount ofwater used was 3,040.45 m3 Ha-1 for both treatments, value that represents 600/o of the amount used by producers who work with gravity irrigation. The harvest performance was 62.75 Tn Ha"1 for intermittent drip irrigation and 57.16 Tn Ha"1 for conventional drip irrigation, both results were favorable for the experiment, as the national average for INIA 320 sweetpotato, performance is around 40 Tn Ha-1 and producers work with gravity irrigation. Another important issue analyzed. when working with intermittent drip irrigation system, was that humidity bulbs, in this treatment, it had a better distribution of water in the soil, this can be verified when we see the humidity curve on the ground, where we see that in the intermittent irrigation treatment the percentage of moisture is 6% higher compared to the drip irrigation conventional treatment.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons