Citas bibligráficas
Cayetano, J., (2019). Crecimiento de cuatro genotipos de cuyes (Cavia porcellus) bajo dos sistemas de alimentación [Tesis, Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/3871
Cayetano, J., Crecimiento de cuatro genotipos de cuyes (Cavia porcellus) bajo dos sistemas de alimentación [Tesis]. : Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2019. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/3871
@mastersthesis{renati/242663,
title = "Crecimiento de cuatro genotipos de cuyes (Cavia porcellus) bajo dos sistemas de alimentación",
author = "Cayetano Robles, Jovana Luz",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2019"
}
The present study was carried out in the facilities of the Farm of guinea pig of the Program of Investigation and Social Projection in Minor Animals (PIPSAM) of the National Agrarian University of La Molina (UNALM), between the months of August and December of the year 2015, with the objective of evaluating the main technical and economic parameters of four genotypes of improved guinea pigs submitted to two feeding systems (integral and mixed) in the growth - fattening stage. We worked with 96 recently weaned male guinea pigs (14 ± 3 days) belonging to the genotypes Cieneguilla - UNALM, Peru - INIA, Cuy G - IVITA/Mantaro/UNMSM and Inkacuy - UCSS; with a general average weight of 364.3 g after the pre-experimental stage. The pelleted diets as well as the water were offered ad libitum for eight weeks, while the forage (chala) was only given to the mixed treatments. The statistical model used was a DCA with factorial arrangement of eight treatments and four repetitions, where the factors were on the one hand the genotype and on the other the feeding system (mixed and integral). The results indicate at the level of genotypes, Cieneguilla, Cuy G and Inkacuy, recorded better weights and weight gains (P <0.05) than the Peru genotype. While, due to the isolated effect of feeding systems, both alternatives gave the same results. The feed conversion favored (P <0.05) the treatment T2 (Cieneguilla-integral); due to the isolated effect of the genotypes, Cieneguilla, was more efficient (P <0.05) in food conversion, while Cuy G, Inkacuy and Peru gave the same result, in that descending numerical order. The carcass yield between treatments registered the same results, with the exception of T8 (Inkacuy-integral), which was the lowest (P> 0.05). Finally, on economic retribution and merit, all the treatments were very similar for the form of profit per unit, with slight advantages for the treatments that used the integral system in the genotypes Cuy G (T6) and Inkacuy (T8).
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons