Citas bibligráficas
Beizaga, Z., Cutipa, G. (2023). Ausencia de mecanismo procesal civil para cuestionar la falta de intento conciliatorio previo y la vulneración del principio de legalidad en el sexto juzgado civil de la corte superior de justicia del Cusco [Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6103
Beizaga, Z., Cutipa, G. Ausencia de mecanismo procesal civil para cuestionar la falta de intento conciliatorio previo y la vulneración del principio de legalidad en el sexto juzgado civil de la corte superior de justicia del Cusco []. PE: Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2023. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/6103
@misc{renati/19624,
title = "Ausencia de mecanismo procesal civil para cuestionar la falta de intento conciliatorio previo y la vulneración del principio de legalidad en el sexto juzgado civil de la corte superior de justicia del Cusco",
author = "Cutipa Condori, Gian Marco",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2023"
}
In our legal system, there is a series of procedural requirements that a natural or legal person must meet at the time of filing a claim before the jurisdictional body, thus, our Peruvian legislation has provided for through a special rule called “The Law of Conciliation", establish the imperative enforceability of any subject of law who, before materializing his right of action, must previously resort to the extrajudicial conciliation center with respect to conciliable matters, a factual assumption, which is framed in the procedural institution called "interest for "act", which every actor must have in his subjective personal sphere to be able to confine himself to the enabling position of going to the judicial bodies in order to achieve effective jurisdictional protection. Consequently, the interest to act constitutes a requirement of provenance duly regulated by the Civil Procedure Code and the Conciliation Law, regulatory devices that empower the judge to declare inadmissible a postulatory document that does not intrinsically contain said procedural institution; Ergo, in practice, this prerequisite is often ignored and/or omitted not only by the Sixth Civil Court of Cusco, but by the majority of the country's jurisdictional bodies, causing a violation in the strict sense of the principle of legality contained in the aforementioned legal precepts. In that sense, the admission of a claim without observing the previous extrajudicial conciliation record would cause greater perplexity for the passive procedural party, who is in legal uncertainty to question said imperfection, considering that, although it can use any of the different procedural instruments, however, it will not be certain whether the procedural tool used will be upheld or rejected, logically implying the lack of predictability of how they will be resolved by the different jurisdictional bodies of the country, including the Sixth Civil Court of Cusco; In turn, the simple fact of using one of the various procedural tools leads to institutionally denaturalizing the existing civil procedural mechanisms, due to the fact that they would not turn out to be the ideal ones to address said problem. Thus, in order to guarantee predictability and legal security to legal operators, it is necessary to regulate an exception of lack of interest to act due to lack of conciliatory attempt, in order to unify and centralize the different positions and/or positions to address the theme developed.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons