Citas bibligráficas
Tovar, A., (2024). Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia de Casación No. 34303- 2019-Lima: REPEXSA vs. Osinergmin, controversia en torno al Aporte por Regulación al Osinergmin [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28358
Tovar, A., Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia de Casación No. 34303- 2019-Lima: REPEXSA vs. Osinergmin, controversia en torno al Aporte por Regulación al Osinergmin []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28358
@misc{renati/18819,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Sentencia de Casación No. 34303- 2019-Lima: REPEXSA vs. Osinergmin, controversia en torno al Aporte por Regulación al Osinergmin",
author = "Tovar Vera, Andrea",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The present work aims to analyze the argumentation presented in the judgments issued by various administrative and judicial bodies, with particular emphasis on that issued by the Supreme Court, considering constitutional principles within the framework of a Constitutional State of Law. The case controversy revolves around the analysis of the Regulatory Contribution to Osinergmin, levied on importers and/or producers of natural gas. To this end, a historical development of the norms will be addressed, along with a teleological interpretation thereof, as well as a proposal for an alternative resolution that would have been desirable on the part of the Supreme Court.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons