Citas bibligráficas
Negrón, C., (2015). Criterio de valoración equitativa para cuantificar el daño moral en la responsabilidad civil extracontractual. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/525
Negrón, C., Criterio de valoración equitativa para cuantificar el daño moral en la responsabilidad civil extracontractual. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2015. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/525
@mastersthesis{renati/18537,
title = "Criterio de valoración equitativa para cuantificar el daño moral en la responsabilidad civil extracontractual.",
author = "Negrón Peralta, Cristian Fabricio",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2015"
}
The research study that develops is about fair evaluation criteria and the absence of a uniform study about moral damage. In the development of this has been observed that this criterion is present in the Peruvian law in regard to quantification of a moral damage that generally consists of a monetary amount determined by the judge in favor of the victim and in the most total absence of motivation regarding this aspect by being subjective protester. At work there is evidence that the criteria of equitable valuation that exclude the application of objective of quantification criteria that can best contribute to a comprehensive compensation that also can be exposed in the reason for the decision, these criteria are almost entirely without quantification of national legal practice, therefore faced with the alternative of using the criterion of equity or take the hard work of researching quantification standards applicable to the case, the legal operator will always prefer the first that causes the compensation amount are not predictable, uniform in similar cases, not mean a full recovery. This research through observation and document analysis is to clarify which criteria are used to establish judicially the compensatory amounts for moral damage, demonstrate the inadequacy of the criterion of equitable valuation into national practice holistically to compensate the moral damage in the extra contractual civil liability, determine the need for a uniform study of moral damage and the nature of their compensation in addition to systematize their quantification criteria. The first chapter of our thesis tells us the problem of the study and the methodology to be addressed in the work. In the second chapter we deal with the legal treatment of civil responsibility, its concept, evolution, typology and budgets. In the third chapter we deal with the moral damage, its concept, its intended overcoming under the figure of harm to the person and the elements of moral damage. In the fourth chapter we delimit the subject to compensate moral damage, terminology details, constitutional dimensions of law to compensate the damage and the duty of motivation of resolutions regarding the determination of the amount. In the fifth chapter we delimit the subject of economic valuation to compensate the moral damage and the systematize their quantification criteria, which results we present in the chapter sixth, with the analysis of the rules of the criterion of equitable valuation and analysis of absence of a uniform study of moral damage and its compensation forms. We hope this work systematically show that the criterion of equitable valuation as well as the absence of a uniform study of moral damage and ways of compensation, influencing effectively in the amounts legally established to compensate the moral damage holistically in the extra contractual liability.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.