Citas bibligráficas
Angeles, J., Taipe, G. (2024). Análisis comparativo de la resistencia a la compresión axial entre el adobe convencional y estabilizado elaborado con cascarilla de arroz, viruta de pino, cascajo de ladrillo y cal, Ica 2023 [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/37123
Angeles, J., Taipe, G. Análisis comparativo de la resistencia a la compresión axial entre el adobe convencional y estabilizado elaborado con cascarilla de arroz, viruta de pino, cascajo de ladrillo y cal, Ica 2023 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/37123
@misc{renati/1676459,
title = "Análisis comparativo de la resistencia a la compresión axial entre el adobe convencional y estabilizado elaborado con cascarilla de arroz, viruta de pino, cascajo de ladrillo y cal, Ica 2023",
author = "Taipe Palacios, German Hector",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2024"
}
The present investigation focused on the subject that aims to carry out the comparative analysis of the compressive strength between conventional adobe and stabilized with rice husks, pine shavings, brick gravel and lime, Ica 2023. Study carried out in the department of Ica in the Parcona district. The methodology was an applied investigation, explanatory level, of experimental design, the sample was conformed by 78 units of adobes. As a result, the determination of the characteristics and composition of conventional and stabilized adobe was obtained, as well as the adequate use of dosages for each proportion of materials, the average resistances exceeded that established in Standard E-080 and that of conventional adobe, except for three dosages: rice (7%) and lime (5% and 10%). The production cost of conventional adobe was lower than the production cost of stabilized adobe. Conclusion: there is a difference between the compressive strength of conventional adobe and adobe stabilized with rice husks, pine shavings, brick rubble and lime, Ica 2023; it was determined that the 10% brick rubble obtained the best improvement percentage (58.46%) in optimal average resistance.
IMPORTANTE
La información contenida en este registro es de entera responsabilidad de la universidad, institución o escuela de educación superior que administra el repositorio académico digital donde se encuentra el trabajo de investigación y/o proyecto, los cuales son conducentes a optar títulos profesionales y grados académicos. SUNEDU no se hace responsable por los contenidos accesibles a través del Registro Nacional de Trabajos de Investigación – RENATI.