Citas bibligráficas
Pasco, A., Pinto, A. (2024). El arraigo en el peligro de fuga de la prisión preventiva: un análisis sociojurídico del razonamiento de los operadores de justicia de la Corte Superior Nacional de Justicia Penal Especializada en casos de corrupción (2017 - 2019) [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29166
Pasco, A., Pinto, A. El arraigo en el peligro de fuga de la prisión preventiva: un análisis sociojurídico del razonamiento de los operadores de justicia de la Corte Superior Nacional de Justicia Penal Especializada en casos de corrupción (2017 - 2019) []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/29166
@misc{renati/1665296,
title = "El arraigo en el peligro de fuga de la prisión preventiva: un análisis sociojurídico del razonamiento de los operadores de justicia de la Corte Superior Nacional de Justicia Penal Especializada en casos de corrupción (2017 - 2019)",
author = "Pinto Córdova, Arianda Juana",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This work analyzes the problem of the non-exceptional application of preventive detention by judges in corruption processes between 2017 and 2019 in Peru. With the aim of understanding the reasons for such non-exceptional application, the thesis resorts to the concept of indeterminacy of Critical Studies of Law to investigate how indetermination is expressed in the judicial application of the rooting of the danger of escape in preventive detention, in the judicial decisions of the CSNJPE on crimes of corruption of officials in the aforementioned period. For this socio-legal analysis, a qualitative, quantitative and jurisprudential methodology is developed, as well as the compilation of documentary information and a genealogical analysis of the figure of roots. This analytical approach to the subject allows us to conclude that roots are an indeterminate legal element to the extent that it is the subject of different judicial interpretations as a basis for the danger of flight. These diverse interpretations fundamentally respond to the purpose that the judge prioritizes, such as the use of the precautionary measure as an instrument of anti-corruption policy, instead of prioritizing the legitimate purpose of this measure, which is to guarantee the presence of the accused person throughout the entire period. the process.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons