Citas bibligráficas
Alcalde, A., (2024). Hablemos de protesta: un análisis de su reconocimiento en el sistema jurídico peruano [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27444
Alcalde, A., Hablemos de protesta: un análisis de su reconocimiento en el sistema jurídico peruano [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27444
@misc{renati/1657258,
title = "Hablemos de protesta: un análisis de su reconocimiento en el sistema jurídico peruano",
author = "Alcalde Valencia, Alessandra",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
Protest is a fundamental right that has been recognized by the Constitutional Court through the ruling issued in Case No. 0009-2018-PI/TC; However, this has been worthy of various criticisms that mainly revolve around the number of magistrates who signed the main text of the ruling (two) and the number of singular votes it has (four). Reason why such recognition has been delegitimized, even by the administrators of justice themselves, such is the case that the Supreme Court this year ruled in favor of denying protest as an autonomous right, which is discouraging for the implementation of guarantees regarding the exercise of the right to protest. Therefore, it is necessary to highlight the recognition that has been given to the right to protest in our regulatory system from three fundamental aspects; firstly, through the recognition of new rights in the national legal system; secondly, from the judicial activism of the Constitutional Court; and thirdly, with the different national and international pronouncements. This, with the purpose of proposing a series of alternatives that seek to provide a guarantee for the exercise of the right to protest, and thus enhance its protection and avoid its tendency towards criminalization.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons