Citas bibligráficas
Alata, E., (2023). Monitoreos hídricos comunitarios y desigualdades de conocimiento en contextos de minería a gran escala: el caso del proyecto minero Tintaya-Antapaccay [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26364
Alata, E., Monitoreos hídricos comunitarios y desigualdades de conocimiento en contextos de minería a gran escala: el caso del proyecto minero Tintaya-Antapaccay []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26364
@mastersthesis{renati/16038,
title = "Monitoreos hídricos comunitarios y desigualdades de conocimiento en contextos de minería a gran escala: el caso del proyecto minero Tintaya-Antapaccay",
author = "Alata Quispe, Eyner",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
This research analyzes the participatory monitoring and community monitoring that have arisen in relation to the Tintaya-Antapaccay mining project in the province of Espinar, Cusco. For this purpose, a qualitative methodology is used. On the one hand, we analyze the participatory monitoring carried out by the mining company and by state institutions such as OEFA and ANA. In this type of monitoring, inequality in knowledge stands out, as technical knowledge is privileged and non-technical knowledge is silenced. It also highlights the inequality in the level of participation of the actors involved. While the State or the mining company directs the monitoring, the participation of civil society is at a minimum level, as assistants or observers of the monitoring. On the other hand, community monitoring is analyzed as a citizen science initiative, proposed by civil society, in this case the Association of Watchmen and Monitors of Espinar (AVMAE), which brings together peasant communities, social organizations of the province, among others. This type of community monitoring overcomes the inequalities that arise in participatory monitoring by the State and the company. In community monitoring, civil society, which possesses non-technical knowledge, appropriates technical knowledge, thus integrating both types of knowledge. Likewise, civil society plays a leading role, its participation is at a higher level, since it directs the monitoring. In this sense, community monitoring overcomes the inequalities found in participatory monitoring.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons