Citas bibligráficas
Miranda, F., (2024). Disposición de bienes comunes por un solo cónyuge ¿nulidad, anulabilidad o ineficacia? análisis del VIII pleno casatorio civil [Universidad de Lima]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/20271
Miranda, F., Disposición de bienes comunes por un solo cónyuge ¿nulidad, anulabilidad o ineficacia? análisis del VIII pleno casatorio civil []. PE: Universidad de Lima; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/20271
@misc{renati/1442831,
title = "Disposición de bienes comunes por un solo cónyuge ¿nulidad, anulabilidad o ineficacia? análisis del VIII pleno casatorio civil",
author = "Miranda Sanchez, Franco William",
publisher = "Universidad de Lima",
year = "2024"
}
The present research work arises from a recurrent legal problem in the national judiciary. Article 315 of the Civil Code states that, in order to carry out acts of disposition, the intervention of both spouses is required. However, it does not indicate which is the applicable legal consequence in case of non-observance. The doctrine, as well as various court rulings on the matter point out three possible solutions: nullity, ineffectiveness and voidability. As a result of the heterogeneous positions, the VIII Plenary Civil Cassation Court had the important mission of establishing the legal consequence applicable to the specific case. The Supreme Court adopts the thesis of nullity; therefore, for all those cases in which one of the spouses unilaterally disposes of a social asset, the sanction of nullity will be applied. In this order of ideas, the present work seeks to offer a contribution to the discussion that follows on the matter. It is clear that the VIII Pleno Casatorio Civil is of mandatory observance by the national civil chambers; however, it is no less true that the decision adopted has been widely discussed by the doctrine. Having said this, we have attempted to analyze the institution of marriage, the non-existence, invalidity and ineffectiveness of the legal act. Likewise, a study of representation and ratification is made. From the study of the aforementioned figures, we end with the analysis of the VIII Plenary Civil Cassation. The majority position of the Supreme Court and the dissenting vote are studied. In addition, an analysis is made of the position of the friends of the court and the binding precedents that are born with this cassatory sentence. Finally, and on the basis of the above, we offer our personal position, arguing that ineffectiveness is the applicable sanction for the acts of disposition of corporate assets carried out unilaterally.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons