Citas bibligráficas
Montañez, (2024). Inadecuada aplicación del adelantamiento de la barrera punitiva en el delito de marcaje o reglaje [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/48651
Montañez, Inadecuada aplicación del adelantamiento de la barrera punitiva en el delito de marcaje o reglaje [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/48651
@mastersthesis{renati/1343149,
title = "Inadecuada aplicación del adelantamiento de la barrera punitiva en el delito de marcaje o reglaje",
author = "Montañez Fernández María Isabel",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego",
year = "2024"
}
Within criminal law, advancing the punitive barrier would imply a risk with respect to the fundamental right of the “freedom” of the person. Therefore, the treatment of this anticipatory technique must be deeply diligent and above all “exceptional”, and must be applied to behaviors with greater social deviation. In accordance with article 317º-A of the Penal Code, the crime of marking or regulation would be understood as that action aimed at surveillance, monitoring and the collection of information for the configuration of a subsequent crime, such as ""crimes against life”, “heritage”, “crimes against personal freedom”, “crimes against sexual freedom” among others; consequently, being a “preparatory act” but sanctioned, in other words, an advancement of the punitive barrier. In other words, what is punished in this crime is a mere “preparatory act.” Consequently, the application of the advancement of the punitive barrier in the crime of Marking or Regulation regulated in art. 317-A of the Penal Code is inadequate; each time, which reveals the State's over-criminal policy, seeking to punish acts prior to the start of the execution of the crime, in its desire to appear to be an effective fight against crime in our country.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons