Bibliographic citations
Espinoza, G., Díaz, C. (2022). La innovación abierta vs la innovación cerrada. Análisis desde el enfoque de creación de valor [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/659730
Espinoza, G., Díaz, C. La innovación abierta vs la innovación cerrada. Análisis desde el enfoque de creación de valor [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/659730
@misc{renati/1292087,
title = "La innovación abierta vs la innovación cerrada. Análisis desde el enfoque de creación de valor",
author = "Díaz Vega, Celisa Marilu",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2022"
}
Open and closed innovation in relation to value creation are very controversial topics to find different positions of authors from different perspectives. Consequently, over time they have evolved with the authors' research, being a fundamental piece for the development and competitiveness of companies at a global and global level. The present work of professional sufficiency was carried out with a qualitative method and a hermeneutical approach where we proceeded to search for scientific journals in digital libraries. On the one hand, three sub-topics were considered prior to the search, which are: The design, management and strategy of innovation for the creation of value. On the other hand, it was possible to find similarities and some controversies with the authors. However, open innovation generates very good results in the companies that have implemented them, but few have managed to achieve them due to the little experience, costs and budgets that these generate for companies. Also, it was possible to highlight that some authors with high rates of open innovation generate value in their companies and clients. What's more, they use external and internal interest groups as a strategy as fundamental pieces for their innovation. The earned reputation of companies is important for them to make innovation changes. Finally, in the case of some authors, they maintain their position in relation to which they state that closed innovation is adequate and should not be changed to open innovation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License