Citas bibligráficas
Lopez, R., (2021). Los límites judiciales para imponer una pena superior a la acordada en el marco de la conclusión anticipada [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20145
Lopez, R., Los límites judiciales para imponer una pena superior a la acordada en el marco de la conclusión anticipada []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2021. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/20145
@misc{renati/11388,
title = "Los límites judiciales para imponer una pena superior a la acordada en el marco de la conclusión anticipada",
author = "Lopez Lopez, Renzo Saul",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2021"
}
This legal report analyzes three central problems addressed within Cassation 113-2017, Áncash, in the framework of the anticipated conclusion: 1) what role does the judge play when the parties have reached an agreement, 2) under what assumptions the judge can reject such agreement, according to Art. 372º, paragraph 5, of the CPP, and 3) what are the limits that the judge has when imposing a penalty higher than the agreed one. Therefore, this paper has concluded the following. Firstly, it has been established that the judge must play an active role when the parties have reached an agreement, within the framework of the anticipated conclusion, so the judge have to carry out a judicial control of such consensus in order to determine whether the agreement is in accordance with the law. Secondly, it is argued that although there is no express mention in Art. 372º, paragraph 5, of the CPP, on whether the judge can reject the penalty agreed upon by the parties to impose a higher one, this power is implicit due to the requirement of the judge to impose a penalty in accordance with the principles of legality and proportionality. Finally, in the same line as the Supreme Court, we have concluded that the judge has 3 limits to take into account when imposing a higher penalty than the one agreed upon by the parties, which are linked to the respect for the principles of: legality, proportionality, accusatory and congruence
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons