Bibliographic citations
Palma, N., (2018). La imparcialidad como principio procesal en la actuación de los jueces superiores en la tramitación de un proceso penal peruano. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/2017
Palma, N., La imparcialidad como principio procesal en la actuación de los jueces superiores en la tramitación de un proceso penal peruano. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/2017
@misc{renati/1126210,
title = "La imparcialidad como principio procesal en la actuación de los jueces superiores en la tramitación de un proceso penal peruano.",
author = "Palma Zanabria, Neil Italo",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2018"
}
The Superior Judges know specific procedural acts and to determine their contamination it must be proven that they have advanced their opinion, however in certain cases they can access the probative activity of the preparatory investigation stage, since in many cases it will be necessary that the superior judges should review all or part of the procedural acts to resolve the impugnant claim. Likewise, one of the reasons why there is a difference between Judges of Investigation Preparatory and Judges of Judgment, is to try to avoid that the judges of judging are contaminated with the process. Faced with the above, it can be stated that sometimes the actions of the Superior Judges, in the processing of an appeal of sentence, could violate the principle of impartiality, since when they are “contaminated“ by knowing in advance the facts and activity Evidence developed, for example, if previously resolved a preventive detention or an exception of inappropriate action, where he had the opportunity to know and analyze the facts subject of debate and the elements of conviction.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.