Bibliographic citations
Diaz, Y., (2022). Relación de la conciliación extrajudicial en torno al desarrollo socio-biológico y familiar del niño en los procesos de régimen de visitas tramitados en los centros de conciliación del distrito de Tarapoto, 2019 [Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial]. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4781
Diaz, Y., Relación de la conciliación extrajudicial en torno al desarrollo socio-biológico y familiar del niño en los procesos de régimen de visitas tramitados en los centros de conciliación del distrito de Tarapoto, 2019 []. PE: Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4781
@misc{renati/1058569,
title = "Relación de la conciliación extrajudicial en torno al desarrollo socio-biológico y familiar del niño en los procesos de régimen de visitas tramitados en los centros de conciliación del distrito de Tarapoto, 2019",
author = "Diaz Alarcon, Yeny",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial",
year = "2022"
}
The Convention on the Rights of the Child (hereinafter CRC), adopts the doctrine of comprehensive protection, which is based "on recognizing special protection for the child as a developing human being and at the same time gives him/her the status of subject of rights and duties", enshrining "the best interests of the child as a guiding principle that serves as a guarantee of assurance regarding the substantive rights of the child" (Calderón, 2008). In Peru, in the sentence issued in Case No. 2132-2008-AA, the Constitutional Court states that: "The constitutional principle of protection of the best interests of the child and adolescent constitutes an implicit constitutional content of Article 4 of the Constitution (Political Constitution of Peru) insofar as it establishes that the community and the State especially protect the child, the adolescent, (...)" (Lingán, 2013). At a local level, it is pointed out that custody agreed upon in conciliation centers lacks the aforementioned guarantees (as is the case in intra-procedural conciliation) and, in particular, there are no criteria for its determination, which violates the principle of the best interests of the child. It is concluded that the relationship between extrajudicial conciliation and the socio-biological and family development of the child in the visitation processes is significant because 90% of the children reached a conciliatory agreement; likewise, the measures to be imposed were the primary ones; that is why the significant relationship is considered as valid.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License