Citas bibligráficas
Angulo, L., (2020). La detención en casos de flagrancia y su relación con el derecho a la libertad en los procesos inmediatos en la Fiscalía Provincial Penal de Bellavista en el Periodo 2018 - 2019 [Tesis, Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial]. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/3729
Angulo, L., La detención en casos de flagrancia y su relación con el derecho a la libertad en los procesos inmediatos en la Fiscalía Provincial Penal de Bellavista en el Periodo 2018 - 2019 [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial; 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/3729
@misc{renati/1058486,
title = "La detención en casos de flagrancia y su relación con el derecho a la libertad en los procesos inmediatos en la Fiscalía Provincial Penal de Bellavista en el Periodo 2018 - 2019",
author = "Angulo Romero, Lady Cheryl",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial",
year = "2020"
}
The present investigation carries out an analysis to Art. 447 paragraph 1 in fine that establishes: “(…) the judge, within forty-eight hours (48) following the prosecuting requirement, conducts a single opening hearing to determine whether an immediate proceedings is appropriate. The detention of the accused is maintained until the hearing takes place".” In other words, to analyze whether the mentioned figure of “maintenance of detention”, for a maximum of 96 hours, even if no preventive detention has been required violates or not the right to freedom, for which we proposed as an object to determine the relationship between detentions in cases of flagrance with the right to freedom in immediate proceedings. For this purpose, this basic type of non- experimental design research was carried out, with a sample of thirty fiscal folders, collected from our field of study as well as the survey of people among judges, prosecutors and lawyers. The main conclusions reached are that there is a high positive correlation between detention in cases of fragrance and the right to freedom. In addition, it was determined that 83.33% of all the cases handled by the Corporate Criminal Prosecutor's Office of Bellavista, the single hearings to determine whether an immediate trial is appropriate were held after the person under investigation had been detained for 72 hours and that 93.33% of the immediate processes have not requested pretrial detention, thus violating the right to freedom of the detainees.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons