Citas bibligráficas
Espinoza, J., (2022). Relación del derecho de alimentos frente al interés superior del niño, en las sentencias emitidas en el 2do Juzgado de Paz Letrado de Tarapoto, 2019 [Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial]. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4631
Espinoza, J., Relación del derecho de alimentos frente al interés superior del niño, en las sentencias emitidas en el 2do Juzgado de Paz Letrado de Tarapoto, 2019 []. PE: Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4631
@misc{renati/1057762,
title = "Relación del derecho de alimentos frente al interés superior del niño, en las sentencias emitidas en el 2do Juzgado de Paz Letrado de Tarapoto, 2019",
author = "Espinoza Flores, Jovana Evelin",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial",
year = "2022"
}
In Latin America, it is pointed out that as long as the family coexistence subsists, it is frequent that the food is satisfied in kind and in this way the obligor fulfills his duty, providing everything necessary for the maintenance of the obligee. However, when disagreements or antagonisms arise between the two parties, it is common for the obligee to appeal to the judge asking that whoever must feed him comply with doing so, for which, generally a sum of money called alimony is set. In our country the characteristics of the right to ask for alimony have a different nuance with respect to the alimony. Thus, the right to ask for alimony is non-transferable, inalienable, intransigible, incompensable and is extinguished by the death of the obligor or obligee; Alimony is unattachable, determinable, variable, circumstantial and is extinguished by prescription, the latter already having a ruling by our Constitutional Court. It is a descriptive correlational type of research which concludes that the relationship between the right to alimony and the best interests of the child is significant.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons