Citas bibligráficas
Ramirez, J., (2022). Las sanciones penales y la reducción de los delitos ambientales en los Juzgados Unipersonales del distrito de Tarapoto en los periodos 2017-2019. [Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial]. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4417
Ramirez, J., Las sanciones penales y la reducción de los delitos ambientales en los Juzgados Unipersonales del distrito de Tarapoto en los periodos 2017-2019. []. PE: Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/11458/4417
@misc{renati/1054330,
title = "Las sanciones penales y la reducción de los delitos ambientales en los Juzgados Unipersonales del distrito de Tarapoto en los periodos 2017-2019.",
author = "Ramirez Diaz, Jaime",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de San Martín. Fondo Editorial",
year = "2022"
}
The present research sought to determine the incidence of criminal sanctions in the reduction of environmental crimes at the unipersonal Courts of Tarapoto, during the period 2017-2019. Its implementation and development was channeled from a quantitative approach - simple descriptive, using for this, the technique of document analysis; in that sense it analyzed a master unit made up of 20 resolutions with first instance sentence all of them collected from within the study scenario. From the results and analysis it was concluded that criminal sanctions for the commission of environmental crimes have little deterrent effect on society and do not comply with the purposes of punishment: prevention, protection and re-socialization. Likewise, it became evident that 45% of the criminal sanctions for the commission of environmental crimes that are dictated in the unipersonal courts of Tarapoto are sentenced to suspended prison sentences, with a probation period ranging from one to two years, while 55% end without any sanction; in other words, with acquittals. Of the acquitted defendants, it has been shown that all of them obtained their innocence through a common criminal process, i.e. through the oral trial, in which 23% of them are due to the lack of expert reports, while 73% of the rulings are due to insufficient evidence to support the presumption of innocence of the accused. However, of the 45% of the cases with convictions, all of them acquired suspended prison sentences, after undergoing the special criminal process of anticipated conclusion, in which the accused, as expressed by law, were deserving of penitential benefits that translate into a reduction of the sentence and to which are added the fine penalties which are merely economic.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons