Citas bibligráficas
Flores, R., Gonzales, G. (2024). La aplicacion del principio de congruencia procesal y el interdicto de recobrar, en la casacion 2769-2017 Arequipa [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Científica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/3113
Flores, R., Gonzales, G. La aplicacion del principio de congruencia procesal y el interdicto de recobrar, en la casacion 2769-2017 Arequipa [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Científica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/3113
@misc{renati/1051165,
title = "La aplicacion del principio de congruencia procesal y el interdicto de recobrar, en la casacion 2769-2017 Arequipa",
author = "Gonzales Perez, Gianmarco Sthil",
publisher = "Universidad Científica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This work develops the figure of the injunction to recover, an institution that seeks to identify whoever exercises it is the possessor, whether legitimate or illegitimate, through which current possession is discussed, regardless of the right. In cassation No. 2769-2017-Arequipa which is the subject of analysis, it can be realized that through this judicial process not only the restitution of possession is sought; but also to maintain social peace An attempt has been made to identify the necessary requirements for an interdict claim to be protected by the judge. This must be reflected in the present work. This type of claim must be processed through the summary process, which is shorter compared to the abbreviated and knowledge process, , even more so when there is a single audience that reflects the implementation of principles such as economy, concentration and procedural speed. The present investigation started from the problem: How has the principle of procedural congruence been applied in the case of cassation 2769-2017 Arequipa? And the objective was: Analyze the way in which the principle of procedural consistency has been applied in cassation 2769-2017 Arequipa. The technique used was a document analysis sheet, analyzing a sample consisting of Cassation 2769-2017 Arequipa, using the type of research method that was Qualitative, Theoretical-Explanatory and dogmatic and a non-experimental 13 design of a descriptive transactional type. Descriptive statistics will be used for statistical analysis. The results indicated that: In cassation No. 2769-2017- Arequipa there is an improper application of the principle of procedural consistency in the interdict to recover, since the Superior Chamber has not fulfilled its duty to issue a ruling on the claim for the interdict to recover from the property located in Block O-2, Lot 01, Module A, Sector 3, City of Cajes-Arequipa, not resolving whether or not to protect the demand for an injunction to recover, directly affecting the principle of procedural consistency.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons