Citas bibligráficas
Vásquez, M., (2018). Comparación del Efecto Antibacteriano in vitro de tres Cementos Selladores Endodónticos frente a la Porphyromonas Endodontalis [Tesis de segunda especialidad, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/11083
Vásquez, M., Comparación del Efecto Antibacteriano in vitro de tres Cementos Selladores Endodónticos frente a la Porphyromonas Endodontalis [Tesis de segunda especialidad]. : Universidad Nacional de Trujillo; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/11083
@misc{renati/1045216,
title = "Comparación del Efecto Antibacteriano in vitro de tres Cementos Selladores Endodónticos frente a la Porphyromonas Endodontalis",
author = "Vásquez Ibáñez, Marie France",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Trujillo",
year = "2018"
}
Objective: To compare the in vitro antibacterial effect of Endodontic Sealant Cements, Endofill, Sealapex, and AH Plus, against Porphyromonas Endodontalis. Material and method: The in vitro antibacterial effect of Endodontic Sealant Cements was compared: Endofill, Sealapex, and AH Plus, against Porphyromonas Endodontalis. To do this, the bacteria were cultivated and the different endodontic sealant cements were placed for 24 hours; to then measure in mm. inhibition halos according to the Duraffourd scale. Results: The in vitro antibacterial effect of endodontic sealant cements: it was observed that the sealant based on zinc oxide and eugenol (Endophil) and the epoxy resin based sealer (AH Plus) were effective; while Sealapex calcium hydroxide based sealant was not effective against Porphyromonas Endodontalis. Conclusion: Porphyromonas Endodontalis bacteria are more susceptible to Endofill sealer cement, with minor haloes being observed; whereas with the cement sealer based on calcium hydroxide (Sealapex) it was not effective; presenting a standard deviation of 11.1.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons