Bibliographic citations
Lozano, K., (2024). Inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de nivel secundaria de una institución educativa pública convenio. Requena, 2022 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Científica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/2779
Lozano, K., Inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de nivel secundaria de una institución educativa pública convenio. Requena, 2022 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Científica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14503/2779
@misc{renati/1038898,
title = "Inteligencia emocional en estudiantes de nivel secundaria de una institución educativa pública convenio. Requena, 2022",
author = "Lozano Guerrero, Katherine Madeline",
publisher = "Universidad Científica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The objective of this study was to determine the levels of emotional intelligence in fifth-year secondary school students of a Public Educational Institution, Requena Convention, 2022. The type of research was simple descriptive because it only describes or estimates parameters in the study population. from a sample. Its temporal scope was transversal since the variables were measured at a single moment. The study design was “nonexperimental” since no variables were manipulated. The research population was made up of 63 students, distributed in sections: A and B, the sample being made up of 54 students. The technique was Psychometric and the instrument was the “BarOn Ice Emotional Intelligence Inventory – NA Short Form in Children and Adolescents”. The results were: Regarding the general result, 42.6% of the fifth-year secondary school students obtained an average level of emotional intelligence, 18.5% obtained a low level, 13.0% obtained a very low level, 11. 1% high level, 7.4% poor level, 5.6% very high and only 1.9% obtained an excellent level. Regarding the “Intrapersonal” dimension, 57.4% obtained an average level, 14.8% obtained a low level, 11.1% a very low level, 11.1% a high level, 3.7% a very high level and only the 1.9% excellent level. In relation to the dimension “Interpersonal, 42.6% obtained an average level, 18.5% a low level, 11.1% a high level, 11.1% a very high level, 9.3% a very low level and only 7.4% obtained poor level. In the “Adaptability” dimension, 46.3% obtained an average level, 18.5% a low level, 14.8% a high level, 9.3% a very high level, 7.4% a very low level, 1.9% an excellent level. and only 1.9% obtained a poor level. Regarding the dimension “Tension management”, 42.6% obtained an average level in tension management, 25.9% low level, 13.0% high level, 9.3% very low, 5.6 % poor, 1.9% very high level and 1.9% excellent level.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License