Citas bibligráficas
Chavez, F., Flores, R. (2024). EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO SÍSMICO DEL PABELLÓN C DE LA I.E. PABLO PATRÓN DE CHOSICA USANDO UN ANÁLISIS ESTÁTICO NO LINEAL [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional, Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)]. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683076
Chavez, F., Flores, R. EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO SÍSMICO DEL PABELLÓN C DE LA I.E. PABLO PATRÓN DE CHOSICA USANDO UN ANÁLISIS ESTÁTICO NO LINEAL [Trabajo de Suficiencia Profesional]. PE: Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC); 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/10757/683076
@misc{renati/1032682,
title = "EVALUACIÓN DEL DESEMPEÑO SÍSMICO DEL PABELLÓN C DE LA I.E. PABLO PATRÓN DE CHOSICA USANDO UN ANÁLISIS ESTÁTICO NO LINEAL",
author = "Flores Leandro, Robinson",
publisher = "Universidad Peruana de Ciencias Aplicadas (UPC)",
year = "2024"
}
In Peru, many educational buildings that are more than 40 years old present seismic risks, since they were built with confined masonry systems or porticoes under the 1977 earthquake-resistant regulations. This generates great concern, especially because these structures can also be used as shelters in disaster cases. Analysis using the pushover method is key to evaluating its level of seismic performance. The seismic performance of a pavilion in the I.E. is evaluated. Pablo Patrón through a non-linear static analysis using the Pushover method. The process begins with a structural survey and diamond core extraction tests. The FEMA 356 displacement coefficient method is then applied to calculate the displacement. The demand curve is constructed according to NTP E.030, and the displacement spectrum is determined based on the ATC and FEMA. The performance level is identified according to Vision 2000 and the SEAOC, which guides the analysis and recommendations for the structure. The analysis revealed that the pavilion's structure is vulnerable, meaning it will not be able to safely withstand a large earthquake. This is because the structural resistance, based on a system of frames on the X axis and confined masonry on the Y axis, shows that the building will suffer visible deformations and irreparable damage. This indicates that the structure is at a pre-collapse level according to Vision 2000 (SEAOC, 1995), this shows that the resistant capacity of the structure compromises stability, approaching structural collapse and is unsafe for the entire educational community. severe structural damage to the building, there is a risk to the safety of people and its repair is no longer possible, which is why demolition is suggested, thereby reducing the high costs of structural reinforcement.
Este ítem está sujeto a una licencia Creative Commons Licencia Creative Commons