Bibliographic citations
Gomez, M., (2023). Estilos de aprendizaje basados en la programación neurolingüística y aprendizaje del idioma inglés en estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Lenguas Extranjeras de la Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle, Lurigancho-Chosica [Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle]. https://repositorio.une.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14039/10346
Gomez, M., Estilos de aprendizaje basados en la programación neurolingüística y aprendizaje del idioma inglés en estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Lenguas Extranjeras de la Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle, Lurigancho-Chosica []. PE: Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle; 2023. https://repositorio.une.edu.pe/handle/20.500.14039/10346
@misc{renati/1023757,
title = "Estilos de aprendizaje basados en la programación neurolingüística y aprendizaje del idioma inglés en estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Lenguas Extranjeras de la Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle, Lurigancho-Chosica",
author = "Gomez Ortega, Mónica",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Educación Enrique Guzmán y Valle",
year = "2023"
}
The objective of this research work was to determine the relationship between learning styles based on neurolinguistic programming and English language learning in the proposed population. This research was based on the quantitative approach, the type of research was non-experimental, the design was correlational and the method was descriptive. The sample consisted of 30 students from the investigated population. The survey was used as a technique, the questionnaire as an instrument, and a knowledge test to measure the second variable. After testing the hypotheses, it was concluded that learning styles based on neurolinguistic programming are significantly related to the learning of the English language in the investigated population, because it was obtained a Spearman's Rho correlation coefficient = 0.678, which indicates a high positive correlation; on the other hand, the significance obtained was p = 0.000 (p < 0.01), which is interpreted at 99.99%, which is how it can be understand that the correlation is significant at the 0.01 bilateral level, rejecting the null hypothesis and accepting the alternative.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License