Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Cordova, A., (2021). Límite de reducción de la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas [Tesis, Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/7071
Cordova, A., Límite de reducción de la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2021. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/7071
@misc{sunedu/3627454,
title = "Límite de reducción de la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas",
author = "Cordova Salazar, Andersson",
publisher = "Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO",
year = "2021"
}
Title: Límite de reducción de la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas
Authors(s): Cordova Salazar, Andersson
Advisor(s): Cruz Vegas, Guillermo Alexander
Keywords: Reducción de la pena; Atenuantes privilegiadas
OCDE field: http://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 2021
Institution: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO
Abstract: Esta investigación ha tomado como base un problema de sumo interés en la
dogmática y sobretodo con incidencia en la práctica procesal penal, pues se
aborda un vacío legal, y proponemos unas solución particular que constituye
una solución que evitar de un lado penas demasiado bajas por delitos con
penas altas, y al mismo tiempo previene la arbitrariedad judicial, mediante un
criterio de interpretación sistemática y teniendo en cuenta la naturaleza de las
atenuantes privilegiadas.
En ese contexto, se formuló como enunciado del problema el siguiente: ¿Qué
criterio jurídico permitiría establecer el límite de la reducción de la pena en las
atenuantes privilegiadas?, estableciendo como objetivo general: Determinar
qué criterio permitiría establecer el límite de la reducción de la pena en las
atenuantes privilegiadas; y como objetivos específicos: establecer los alcances
del sistema de determinación penas en la legislación nacional peruana, analizar
las atenuantes privilegiadas según la dogmática y el código penal peruano,
explicar cuál es el criterio que permitiría establecer el límite de la reducción de
la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas.
Utilizados los métodos jurídicos de investigación que se han desarrollado en la
presente tesis, sobre todo el dogmático y en función de lo que la doctrina y la
poca jurisprudencia que existe, se ha llegado a comprobar la hipótesis
siguiente: el criterio jurídico que permitiría establecer el límite de la reducción
de la pena en las atenuantes privilegiadas es la equiparación a la confesión
sincera; debiendo operar una reducción hasta en una tercera parte por debajo
del mínimo legal, lo cual reduciría los márgenes de indeterminación judicial al
momento de imponer la pena concreta.
This investigation has taquen as a bases a problem of Greta inertes in dogmatices and above all with an impact on criminal procedural practice, since it addresses a legal vacuum, and we propose a particular solution that constitutes a solution that avoids, on the one hand, too low penalties for crimes with high penalties, and at the same time prevents judicial arbitrariness, through a criterion of systematic interpretation and taking into account the nature of the privileged mitigating circumstances. In this context, the following was formulated as a statement of the problem: What legal criterion would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in privileged mitigating circumstances ?, establishing as a general objective: Determine which criterion would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the grief in privileged mitigating circumstances; and as specific objectives: to establish the scope of the penalty determination system in Peruvian national legislation, to analyze the privileged mitigating factors according to Peruvian dogmatices and the penal code, to explain what is the criterion that would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in the privileged mitigating factors. Using the legal research methods that have been developed in this thesis, especially the dogmatic one and depending on what the doctrine and the little jurisprudence that exists, the following hypothesis has been verified: the legal criteria that would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in the privileged mitigating circumstances is the comparison to the sincere confession; a reduction of up to a third below the legal minimum must operate, which would reduce the margins of judicial indeterminacy when imposing the specific penal.
This investigation has taquen as a bases a problem of Greta inertes in dogmatices and above all with an impact on criminal procedural practice, since it addresses a legal vacuum, and we propose a particular solution that constitutes a solution that avoids, on the one hand, too low penalties for crimes with high penalties, and at the same time prevents judicial arbitrariness, through a criterion of systematic interpretation and taking into account the nature of the privileged mitigating circumstances. In this context, the following was formulated as a statement of the problem: What legal criterion would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in privileged mitigating circumstances ?, establishing as a general objective: Determine which criterion would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the grief in privileged mitigating circumstances; and as specific objectives: to establish the scope of the penalty determination system in Peruvian national legislation, to analyze the privileged mitigating factors according to Peruvian dogmatices and the penal code, to explain what is the criterion that would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in the privileged mitigating factors. Using the legal research methods that have been developed in this thesis, especially the dogmatic one and depending on what the doctrine and the little jurisprudence that exists, the following hypothesis has been verified: the legal criteria that would allow establishing the limit of the reduction of the sentence in the privileged mitigating circumstances is the comparison to the sincere confession; a reduction of up to a third below the legal minimum must operate, which would reduce the margins of judicial indeterminacy when imposing the specific penal.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12759/7071
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Chanduvi Cornejo, Víctor Hugo; Espínola Otiniano, Diomedes Hernando
Register date: 21-Jan-2021
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.