Bibliographic citations
Aburto, M., (2023). Informe sobre Resolución de Consejo Directivo N° 034-2009-CD-OSITRAN de fecha 23 de septiembre de 2009: Análisis de la función de interpretación de contratos de concesión del OSITRAN en el marco de la solicitud de interpretación complementaria efectuada por Lima Airport Partners en el Expediente Nº 043-2009-OSITRAN [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24368
Aburto, M., Informe sobre Resolución de Consejo Directivo N° 034-2009-CD-OSITRAN de fecha 23 de septiembre de 2009: Análisis de la función de interpretación de contratos de concesión del OSITRAN en el marco de la solicitud de interpretación complementaria efectuada por Lima Airport Partners en el Expediente Nº 043-2009-OSITRAN []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/24368
@misc{sunedu/3583821,
title = "Informe sobre Resolución de Consejo Directivo N° 034-2009-CD-OSITRAN de fecha 23 de septiembre de 2009: Análisis de la función de interpretación de contratos de concesión del OSITRAN en el marco de la solicitud de interpretación complementaria efectuada por Lima Airport Partners en el Expediente Nº 043-2009-OSITRAN",
author = "Aburto Vicuña, Milagros Isolina",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
OSITRAN's function of interpreting public transportation infrastructure concession contracts, as provided for in section 7.1, subsection e) of article 7 of Law No. 26917, Law for the Supervision of Private Investment in Transportation Infrastructure for Public Use and Promotion of Air Transportation Services, is unique in its type since it has not been attributed to any other regulatory agency. Likewise, this function necessarily implies the existence of a special administrative procedure whose purpose is to interpret the ambiguous clauses of the concession contracts, which must be framed within a clear legal framework that allows OSITRAN to have clear criteria for action. However, the special rules that regulate the contractual interpretation procedure of OSITRAN are insufficient, giving an important role to the general rules applicable to administrative procedures; and, a lack of clarity both for the public administration and for those with legitimate interests in the interpretation of the concession contracts. In these conditions, Lima Airport Partners requested OSITRAN a complementary interpretation to the previously interpreted numeral 2 of Annex 11 of the Concession Contract of the Jorge Chávez International Airport, regarding the scope of the obligation of the Peruvian State, represented by the Ministry of Transportation and Communications, to deliver the land for the expansion of the project "duly cleaned up". In this regard, OSITRAN declared such request inadmissible and, subsequently, the appeal for reconsideration of such decision was unfounded. However, in view of the confusing normative scenario that regulated the actions of the regulatory agency and the questionable decisions of the latter, the opportunity arises to carry out a detailed analysis of OSITRAN's actions with the purpose of seeking criteria for future actions that guarantee greater legal certainty, as mentioned, both for the public entity and for the public.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License