Bibliographic citations
Guevara, F., (2022). El VIII Pleno Casatorio Civil: el perjuicio al adquiriente de buena fe con el fallo de nulidad en el acto de disposición de bienes sociales por un solo de los cónyuges [Tesis, Universidad Privada del Norte]. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/32674
Guevara, F., El VIII Pleno Casatorio Civil: el perjuicio al adquiriente de buena fe con el fallo de nulidad en el acto de disposición de bienes sociales por un solo de los cónyuges [Tesis]. PE: Universidad Privada del Norte; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/11537/32674
@misc{sunedu/3369707,
title = "El VIII Pleno Casatorio Civil: el perjuicio al adquiriente de buena fe con el fallo de nulidad en el acto de disposición de bienes sociales por un solo de los cónyuges",
author = "Guevara Infante, Flor Yolanda",
publisher = "Universidad Privada del Norte",
year = "2022"
}
The objective of the present investigation is to know that the decision of the Supreme Judges, in the VIII Plenary Civil Cassation, has harmed the acquirer in good faith; That is why in this thesis the hypothesis was raised that the legal treatment of acts of unilateral disposition of assets of the conjugal partnership without the intervention of the other, is ineffectiveness in the strict sense and not nullity, in the same way we propose to know if the binding judicial precedent established by the Supreme Court can be changed so that it does not harm any of the parties. The type of research was practical - descriptive with a qualitative approach within a non-experimental design. The sample that was used was five Sentences of the Supreme Court, seven expert lawyers in civil matters, eighteen connoisseurs of the law and fifteen married people. The results show that the decision of the Judges has harmed the purchaser in good faith, because the Magistrates have not ruled on the legal certainty that protects him if he buys an asset from the conjugal partnership. In addition, they indicate that the binding precedents are mandatory, but are not absolute. It is concluded that inefficiency is the most appropriate legal remedy to safeguard the right to property and to a family project of the acquirer in good faith. In the same sense, it was concluded that the judges can deviate from the binding precedents if they make an assessment of the facts with due motivation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License