Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Ruiz, I., (2022). Informe Jurídico Sentencia 142-2011-AA/TC Caso Minera María Julia [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23124
Ruiz, I., Informe Jurídico Sentencia 142-2011-AA/TC Caso Minera María Julia []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23124
@misc{sunedu/3229935,
title = "Informe Jurídico Sentencia 142-2011-AA/TC Caso Minera María Julia",
author = "Ruiz Valle, Ignacio Augusto",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
Title: Informe Jurídico Sentencia 142-2011-AA/TC Caso Minera María Julia
Authors(s): Ruiz Valle, Ignacio Augusto
Advisor(s): Pérez-Prieto de las Casas, Roberto José
Keywords: Derechos fundamentales--Perú; Arbitraje y laudo--Jurisprudencia--Perú; Derecho constitucional--Jurisprudencia--Perú
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 16-Aug-2022
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El presente Informe Jurídico versa en torno a una de las sentencias más relevantes emitidas
por el Tribunal Constitucional peruano: la sentencia 142-2011-AA/TC, también conocida
como el caso Minera María Julia. La sentencia estableció los tres únicos posibles casos de
procedencia del amparo contra laudo arbitral, definiendo que, para los demás casos, el
medio idóneo era el recurso de anulación de laudo. El presente informe analiza lo
establecido por el Tribunal Constitucional considerando la naturaleza tanto del recurso de
anulación de laudo como de la acción de amparo arbitral.
Para ello, se realiza un análisis del recurso de anulación de laudo, observando si se trata de
un recurso o de un proceso autónomo. De igual manera, se analiza cuánta capacidad real
tiene el recurso de anulación de laudo para proteger derechos fundamentales en reemplazo
de la acción de amparo. Posteriormente, se revisa la naturaleza de la acción de amparo,
determinando la necesidad de mantener su carácter de urgencia y de proceso residual.
Finalmente, se observa el conflicto que surge al querer determinar cómo armonizar el
correcto uso del recurso de anulación de laudo con la necesidad de mantener al proceso de
amparo como una vía residual, concluyéndose que debe añadirse un criterio adicional.
This Legal Report deals with one of the most relevant judgments issued by the Peruvian Constitutional Court: Judgment 142-2011-AA/TC, also known as the Minera María Julia case. The judgment established the only three possible cases in which an amparo action against an arbitration award could be granted, defining that, for the other cases, the appropriate remedy was the appeal for annulment of the award. This report analyzes the Constitutional Court's ruling, considering the nature of both the appeal for annulment of the award and the amparo action. To this end, an analysis is made of the appeal for annulment of the award, noting whether it is an appeal/recourse or an autonomous process. Likewise, an analysis is made of the real capacity of the appeal for annulment of the award to protect fundamental rights in replacement of the amparo action. Subsequently, the nature of the amparo action is reviewed, determining the need to maintain its character of urgency and residual process. Finally, the conflict that arises when trying to determine how to harmonize the correct use of the appeal for annulment of the award with the need to maintain the amparo process as a residual remedy is observed, concluding that an additional criterion must be added.
This Legal Report deals with one of the most relevant judgments issued by the Peruvian Constitutional Court: Judgment 142-2011-AA/TC, also known as the Minera María Julia case. The judgment established the only three possible cases in which an amparo action against an arbitration award could be granted, defining that, for the other cases, the appropriate remedy was the appeal for annulment of the award. This report analyzes the Constitutional Court's ruling, considering the nature of both the appeal for annulment of the award and the amparo action. To this end, an analysis is made of the appeal for annulment of the award, noting whether it is an appeal/recourse or an autonomous process. Likewise, an analysis is made of the real capacity of the appeal for annulment of the award to protect fundamental rights in replacement of the amparo action. Subsequently, the nature of the amparo action is reviewed, determining the need to maintain its character of urgency and residual process. Finally, the conflict that arises when trying to determine how to harmonize the correct use of the appeal for annulment of the award with the need to maintain the amparo process as a residual remedy is observed, concluding that an additional criterion must be added.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23124
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Pérez-Prieto De las Casas, Roberto José; Mendoza del Maestro, Gilberto; Moscol Salinas, Alejandro Martín
Register date: 16-Aug-2022; 16-Aug-2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License