Bibliographic citations
Losno, J., (2022). La Enajenación de Secciones de Propiedad Exclusiva por parte de la Junta de Propietarios: a propósito de la Resolución N° 2574- 2018-SUNARP-TR-L que exige una mayoría calificada [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22906
Losno, J., La Enajenación de Secciones de Propiedad Exclusiva por parte de la Junta de Propietarios: a propósito de la Resolución N° 2574- 2018-SUNARP-TR-L que exige una mayoría calificada []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22906
@misc{sunedu/3177118,
title = "La Enajenación de Secciones de Propiedad Exclusiva por parte de la Junta de Propietarios: a propósito de la Resolución N° 2574- 2018-SUNARP-TR-L que exige una mayoría calificada",
author = "Losno Perleche, Jhon",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This legal report analyzes Resolution No. 2574-2018-SUNARP-TR-L, in relation to the transfer of sections of exclusive property of the Board of Owners in the Exclusive Property and Common Property Regime, and the approval, by the owners, for the alienation of these assets, extreme in which I question the position of the Registry Court that requires the manifestation of will of owners representing two thirds of the shares over the common property in order to be able to sell exclusive property assets under the ownership of the Board. To this end, first the legal nature of the Board is examined, to which I argue that it is a subject of law with relative legal subjectivity, and that, therefore, it can acquire and dispose of property in its own name, which does not detract from the exclusive nature of the property acquired. Subsequently, I point out that, if the purpose of the acquisition of the exclusive property by the Meeting is the alienation, there is no reason to require a qualified majority, but only an absolute majority, since there has already been a previous agreement in the Meeting to sell; in this way, the third party in good faith will be protected if it reviews said purpose, which is recorded in the minutes of the meeting of the Owners' Meeting. Then, I explain the representation that the Board must have for the transfer of the goods of exclusive domain, to which I affirm that the president represents the Board (and not the owners) in the transaction, whose formality is the Public Deed. Finally, I come to the conclusion that, for the acts of disposition of the exclusive sections under the ownership of the Board, only the votes of the absolute majority are required, and not qualified, which deserves an amendment to Law No. 27157 and its Regulations.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License