Bibliographic citations
García, S., (2018). Validación del método cronométrico de Knebelman en los diferentes biotipos faciales de estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Estomatología, Universidad Andina del Cusco 2017. [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1743
García, S., Validación del método cronométrico de Knebelman en los diferentes biotipos faciales de estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Estomatología, Universidad Andina del Cusco 2017. [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/1743
@misc{sunedu/3042380,
title = "Validación del método cronométrico de Knebelman en los diferentes biotipos faciales de estudiantes de la Escuela Profesional de Estomatología, Universidad Andina del Cusco 2017.",
author = "García Polo, Styven",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2018"
}
Objective: to determine if the craniometric method of knebelman is valid to determine the actual vertical occlusal dimension in a population of students, according to their facial biotype, for a later clinical application in the Cusco population. We evaluated in the students whether the real DVO (measurement of the lower facial third when the patient is in the maximum intercuspidation) is equal or similar to the measurement provided by the craniometric method of knebelman to the anterior face of the external auditory canal). Material and method: A sample of students from the Professional School of Stomatology of the Universidad Andina del Cusco (52 men and 92 women) aged 18 to 31 years were selected according to the following criteria; complete natural dentition, stable dental occlusion without facial asymmetry and students with Cusco parents. Using the facial morphological index of kollman, the sample was grouped according to its facial biotype. The DVO as well as the left and right craniometric distance were measured by a single operator using a digital vernier. Through the student of and with a significance> 0.05 it was determined that the measurement provided by the craniometric method on the right side is the one that shows the greatest similarity with the DVO, so both clinically were compared considering a maximum discrepancy of 2 mm to be validated . Results: There is no relevant clinical difference in students with mesofacial or dolichofacial biotype but in brachifacial. Conclusions: The craniometric knee method is valid to determine OVD in patients with mesofacial and dolichofacial biotypes, but not in brachifacial patients, where their absolute validation is more studied because the sample is found to be reduced.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.