Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Huacac, M., (2020). Análisis del bien jurídico en el delito de enriquecimiento ilícito [Tesis, Universidad Andina del Cusco]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3566
Huacac, M., Análisis del bien jurídico en el delito de enriquecimiento ilícito [Tesis]. : Universidad Andina del Cusco; 2020. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3566
@phdthesis{sunedu/3042267,
title = "Análisis del bien jurídico en el delito de enriquecimiento ilícito",
author = "Huacac Carrillo, Mirian",
publisher = "Universidad Andina del Cusco",
year = "2020"
}
Title: Análisis del bien jurídico en el delito de enriquecimiento ilícito
Authors(s): Huacac Carrillo, Mirian
Advisor(s): Salazar Mujica, Alan Felipe
Keywords: Enriquecimiento ilícito; Bien jurídico; Delito; Administración pública
Issue Date: 11-Sep-2020
Institution: Universidad Andina del Cusco
Abstract: La presente investigación titulada “ANÁLISIS DEL BIEN JURÍDICO EN EL DELITO
DE ENRIQUECIMIENTO ILÍCITO”. Por cuanto en la actualidad la conducta ilícita desarrollada
por los servidores públicos en razón a su patrimonio se halla impune, pues existen criterios
contradictorios y diversos sobre el bien jurídico del delito de Enriquecimiento Ilícito en razón a
que no se establece en forma real cual es el bien jurídico protegido de dicho tipo penal por lo que
la presente investigación se basara en analizar y clarificar cual es en realidad el bien jurídico
protegido el delito de Enriquecimiento Ilícito para fines de sancionar su afectación, asimismo se
tiene como objetivo principal del presente estudio analizar el bien jurídico en el delito de
enriquecimiento ilícito, puesto que se advirtió un vacío normativo e inaplicabilidad de dicho tipo
penal en diversas conductas delictivas, ya que no se precisa con claridad cuál es la conducta
reprimible que afecte al bien jurídico protegido por dicho tipo penal, pues la norma sustantiva
detalla diversas conductas punibles que afectan el patrimonio de la Administración Publica y el
incremento del patrimonio en forma ilícita del Funcionario Público, sancionándose mediante los
delitos de peculado, cohecho entre otros, sin embargo se observa escasa o casi nada sanción
punible mediante sentencias condenatorias respecto al delito de Enriquecimiento Ilícito pese a que
se advierten en muchos casos el incremento del patrimonio en forma ilícita del Funcionario
Público, sin embargo dichas conductas han sido sancionadas por otros tipos penales más no por el
delito de Enriquecimiento Ilícito, conforme el análisis realizado en las sentencias emitidas por el
órgano jurisdiccional especializado en materia penal y que tramita procesos sobre delitos de
Corrupción de Funcionarios de la Corte Superior de Justicia del Cusco en el año 2018 y la
entrevista a jurisconsultos en materia penal. El presente trabajo de investigación es de tipo dogmático y jurídico, el enfoque es
cualitativo- documental.
This research entitled “ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROPERTY IN THE CRIME OF ILLICIT ENRICHMENT.“ As currently the illegal conduct developed by public servants because of their heritage is unpunished, because there are conflicting and diverse criteria on the legal good of the crime of Illicit Enrichment because it is not established in real form what is the legal good protected from said criminal type so that the present investigation will be based on analyzing and clarifying which is actually the legal good protected the crime of Illicit Enrichment for the purpose of sanctioning its affectation, also it has as main objective of the present study to analyze the legal good in the crime of illicit enrichment, since there was a regulatory vacuum and inapplicability of said criminal type in various criminal behaviors, since it is not clearly stated what is the repressible conduct that affects the legal good protected by said criminal type, as the substantive rule details various punishable behaviors that affect and l Public Administration assets and the increase in the unlawful assets of the Public Official, being sanctioned through crimes of peculation, bribery, among others, however little or almost nothing is punishable by convictions regarding the crime of Illicit Enrichment despite that in many cases the increase of the unlawful patrimony of the Public Official is noticed, however, such behaviors have been sanctioned by other criminal types but not for the crime of Illicit Enrichment, according to the analysis performed in the sentences issued by the specialized court in criminal matters and that processes proceedings on crimes of Corruption of Officials of the Superior Court of Justice of Cusco in 2018 and the interview with jurists in criminal matters.
This research entitled “ANALYSIS OF LEGAL PROPERTY IN THE CRIME OF ILLICIT ENRICHMENT.“ As currently the illegal conduct developed by public servants because of their heritage is unpunished, because there are conflicting and diverse criteria on the legal good of the crime of Illicit Enrichment because it is not established in real form what is the legal good protected from said criminal type so that the present investigation will be based on analyzing and clarifying which is actually the legal good protected the crime of Illicit Enrichment for the purpose of sanctioning its affectation, also it has as main objective of the present study to analyze the legal good in the crime of illicit enrichment, since there was a regulatory vacuum and inapplicability of said criminal type in various criminal behaviors, since it is not clearly stated what is the repressible conduct that affects the legal good protected by said criminal type, as the substantive rule details various punishable behaviors that affect and l Public Administration assets and the increase in the unlawful assets of the Public Official, being sanctioned through crimes of peculation, bribery, among others, however little or almost nothing is punishable by convictions regarding the crime of Illicit Enrichment despite that in many cases the increase of the unlawful patrimony of the Public Official is noticed, however, such behaviors have been sanctioned by other criminal types but not for the crime of Illicit Enrichment, according to the analysis performed in the sentences issued by the specialized court in criminal matters and that processes proceedings on crimes of Corruption of Officials of the Superior Court of Justice of Cusco in 2018 and the interview with jurists in criminal matters.
Link to repository: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12557/3566
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Universidad Andina del Cusco. Escuela de Pos Grado
Grade or title: Doctor en Derecho
Register date: 19-Jan-2021; 19-Jan-2021
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License