Bibliographic citations
Oviedo, M., (2018). Evaluación de las metodologías para el desarrollo del inventario nacional de gases de efecto invernadero en el sector industrial [Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/3456
Oviedo, M., Evaluación de las metodologías para el desarrollo del inventario nacional de gases de efecto invernadero en el sector industrial []. PE: Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina; 2018. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12996/3456
@misc{sunedu/3014131,
title = "Evaluación de las metodologías para el desarrollo del inventario nacional de gases de efecto invernadero en el sector industrial",
author = "Oviedo Rodríguez, María del Carmen Paloma",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina",
year = "2018"
}
The increase of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere causes global warming that affects natural ecosystems and humanity. Given this, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) recognizes the need for cooperation from all countries. Being part of the UNFCCC, Peru undertakes to periodically report its National GHG Inventories (INGEI). In this context, the methodologies of the "2006 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories" (GL2006) attribute non-energy emissions from the industrial activities to the Industrial Processes and Use of Products (PIUP). The general objective of this work is to evaluate the application of the GL2006 methodologies in the sector PIUP of the INGEI, including a comparison of the applications in Peru, Chile and Colombia and the review of the results and the information used in the INGEI of the year 2012 from Peru. Less than 60% of the possible emission sources identified for PIUP have methodological guidelines in the GL2006. Of these, 15% are estimated in the INGEI of Peru. Among the emissions from Peru, Chile and Colombia, the minerals industry was identified as having the highest participation and as the most estimated one. The results are affected by how the methods are applied. In addition, the required information is not always available. To improve the INGEI, it is recommended to evaluate: the relevance of each source at the emission level; the informants and generators of information; the availability and access to information; and, the importance of the source in the national policy. It is recommended to prioritize the most significant sources (such as cement) or others that imply development for the country
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License