Bibliographic citations
Carrillo, G., Flores, E. (2022). Programa “Glader” basado en rúbricas y su influencia en el desempeño docente de la I.E. “Ciencia, Luz y Vida” – Sihuas [Tesis de segunda especialidad, Universidad Nacional de Trujillo]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/18032
Carrillo, G., Flores, E. Programa “Glader” basado en rúbricas y su influencia en el desempeño docente de la I.E. “Ciencia, Luz y Vida” – Sihuas [Tesis de segunda especialidad]. PE: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo; 2022. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/18032
@misc{renati/884294,
title = "Programa “Glader” basado en rúbricas y su influencia en el desempeño docente de la I.E. “Ciencia, Luz y Vida” – Sihuas",
author = "Flores Vaca, Eder Nikey",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Trujillo",
year = "2022"
}
The purpose of this research was to determine how the application of the “Glader” program based on evaluation rubrics influences the professional teaching performance of the secondary level of the I.E. “Ciencia, Luz y Vida” – Sihuas. For this, a type of experimental research was chosen with a quasi-experimental design, which was executed in a population and sample of 24 teachers, divided into two groups, experimental (science) and control (letters). Both groups were applied with a Monitoring and Accompaniment Sheet for teacher performance (classroom observation rubrics) as a data collection instrument, with pre test and post test. Start and process levels were observed in both groups; at the beginning of the investigation, both in the dependent variable and in each of its dimensions: actively involves students in the learning process, with three aspects to observe; promotes reasoning, creativity and/or critical thinking, with one aspect; assesses the progress of learning to provide feedback to students and adapt their teaching, with two aspects; it fosters an environment of respect and proximity, with three aspects; and, positively regulates student behavior, with two aspects to observe. That is; each rubric has a score of 1 minimum and 4 maximum. Results that were modified in the post-test of the experimental group where the satisfactory and prominent level predominates, since the average in the pre-test was 8.8 and the average of the post-test was 16.4, with a significant difference of 7.6. While the control group maintains its results at the start and process levels, it had an average of 8.8 in the pre test and post test. Likewise, the Student T was used, which was statistically significant in terms of the experimental group, where its value is 29.2524 and the tabular value is 1.796 (p <0,05; p=0.0000).
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License