Bibliographic citations
Acosta, C., Salvador, B. (2024). Influencia del espesor y de las inoculaciones de aluminio sobre la autoalimentación, dureza y microestructura en piezas de latón 85Cu5Zn5Sn5Pb fundido y colado en moldes de arena en verde [Universidad Nacional de Trujillo]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/21805
Acosta, C., Salvador, B. Influencia del espesor y de las inoculaciones de aluminio sobre la autoalimentación, dureza y microestructura en piezas de latón 85Cu5Zn5Sn5Pb fundido y colado en moldes de arena en verde []. PE: Universidad Nacional de Trujillo; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14414/21805
@misc{renati/883543,
title = "Influencia del espesor y de las inoculaciones de aluminio sobre la autoalimentación, dureza y microestructura en piezas de latón 85Cu5Zn5Sn5Pb fundido y colado en moldes de arena en verde",
author = "Salvador Vejarano, Bryam Jesús",
publisher = "Universidad Nacional de Trujillo",
year = "2024"
}
“Influence of thickness and aluminum inoculations on self-feeding, hardness and microstructure in 85Cu5Zn5Sn5Pb brass pieces cast and cast in green sand molds” was studied. With twofactor design, 13 levels of thickness (5; 7; 9; 11; 13; 15; 17; 19; 22; 25; 30; 35 and 40 mm), 5 levels of inoculated aluminum (0; 1; 3; 5 and 7%), three replicates of the experiment and randomized experimental runs. Each casting was made at 1140 °C, 48 hours after molding, self-feeding and shrinkage were measured based on the Archimedes method and weight losses. At least 40 HB hardness measurements were made per specimen. For self-feeding and the intensity of forming the suck, the ANOVA of the data indicates great influence of the thickness, very little influence of the percentages of inoculated aluminum and practically no influence of the interaction of both variables. For HB surface hardness, the ANOVA determined the opposite: Great influence of the inoculated aluminum, less influence of the thickness and very little influence of the interaction of both variables on the hardness. The maximum self-feeding (100%) is achieved for maximum thicknesses of 7 mm, it decreases to 4.02% -13.57% for 25 mm and becomes 0% for 40 mm, independent of the inoculated aluminum, the maximum volume deficit It was between 2.3 and 2.6% in all cases. The maximum hardness increases due to thickness for alloys with 0; 1; 3; 5 and 7% Al inoculated, with respect to the starting hardness, were: 50.06%; 15.54%; 24.41%; 22.62% and 26.61%, respectively. The increases in hardness due to aluminum for each thickness were: 208.63%; 221.00%; 224.26%; 232.32%; 249.34%; 256.96%; 252.32%; 274.82%; 261.50%; 282.73; 259.06%; 243.98% and 265.78%. The interaction of the study variables had little influence on increases in hardness. Without aluminum inoculation, the microstructures show typical α-brass dendrites with fine inter-dendritic Pb nodules in the middle of a possible β' phase, well distributed, fine dendrites at small thicknesses and thick dendrites for specimens. Thickness indicates grain size consistent with the measured hardnesses and the zinc equivalent of approximately 19.2%. The microstructures for alloys with aluminum inoculations in various percentages and post heat treatment show grains and dendrites with Pb nodules between the α phases; β´; α +β´ and β´ + γ that appear according to calculated zinc equivalent and are consistent with measured hardnesses.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License