Bibliographic citations
Chumpitazi, S., Pacahuala, L., Soriano, M., Tuñoque, Z. (2024). Estilo de Manejo de Conflico en Docentes del Nivel Primaria de Instituciones Educativas de la UGEL 07 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional, Universidad Marcelino Champagnat]. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14231/3702
Chumpitazi, S., Pacahuala, L., Soriano, M., Tuñoque, Z. Estilo de Manejo de Conflico en Docentes del Nivel Primaria de Instituciones Educativas de la UGEL 07 [Trabajo de suficiencia profesional]. PE: Universidad Marcelino Champagnat; 2024. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14231/3702
@misc{renati/801358,
title = "Estilo de Manejo de Conflico en Docentes del Nivel Primaria de Instituciones Educativas de la UGEL 07",
author = "Tuñoque Yovera, Zulema",
publisher = "Universidad Marcelino Champagnat",
year = "2024"
}
The fundamental purpose of this research was to discern the style that primary level teachers at UGEL 07 adopt to manage conflicts. To achieve this, basic research was implemented with a quantitative approach and a simple non-experimental descriptive design. The target sample was made up of 94 primary level teachers from UGEL 07. As an evaluation tool, the TKI Thommas Kilmann Conflict Model Instrument was used, originally developed by Thommas and Kilmann in 1974, and later adapted in Peru by Izaquel Marcelino RodrÌguez. in 2012 and validated by Ampuero in 2017. This investigative study focused on determining the conflict management styles among primary level teachers belonging to educational institutions attached to the UGEL 07. A non-experimental quantitative approach was used with a simple descriptive design. The sample consisted of 94 teachers. Conflict management styles were evaluated through the dimensions: accommodating, collaborative, compromising, competitive and evasive. The results revealed that the average level of conflict management styles was the most frequent, representing 60% of the sample. On the other hand, the high level had an incidence of 4%, the very high level 5%, while the very low and very low level represented 12% and 19% respectively. In general terms, it is concluded that the predominant conflict management style among teachers was compromise, as indicated by the average level obtained in the survey. On the other hand, the evasive style was identified as the least used, highlighting its highest incidence at the very low level, which suggests a lower use of this dimension by teachers, according to the perception obtained through the survey.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License