Bibliographic citations
Oblitas, M., (2024). Análisis sísmico comparativo entre un edificio de gran altura con sistema convencional y disipadores de energía [Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12423/7497
Oblitas, M., Análisis sísmico comparativo entre un edificio de gran altura con sistema convencional y disipadores de energía []. PE: Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12423/7497
@misc{renati/583833,
title = "Análisis sísmico comparativo entre un edificio de gran altura con sistema convencional y disipadores de energía",
author = "Oblitas Gonzales, Mario",
publisher = "Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo",
year = "2024"
}
Peru is located in the belt of fire where more than 80% of large earthquakes have occurred. Among the most relevant earthquakes were in April 2016 in Manta Ecuador and Concepción Chile in February 2010 where multi-level buildings collapsed, causing 602 and 525 deaths respectively. Therefore, it is very important to implement seismic protection systems in buildings to dissipate energy in the event of a moderate to severe seismic event and save the lives of its occupants. Taking this into account, in the present investigation, a comparison is made between a conventional system and another implementation with Chevron viscous fluid dissipators (DFVC) in a high-rise building in the city of Chiclayo. As the first step of the methodology, the characterization of the site was carried out through the standard (SPT) penetration test, geophysical studies of seismic refraction (RS) and multichannel analysis of surface waves (MASW). Subsequently, spectral modal dynamic modeling and analysis (ADME) was carried out according to the E.030 standard for the conventional structure and the nonlinear time history analysis (ATHNL) for the structure implemented with DFVC with the ASCE7-16 Standard. As a result, a floor S₂ is calculated, the displacements of the structure with DFVC were reduced by 66.66% and 56.46% these dissipators absorbed 60.38% and 61.26% of the earthquake energy in the X-X and Y-Y direction respectively.es el resumen traducido al idioma inglés.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License