Bibliographic citations
Carrasco, A., (2023). Coincidencias y diferencias en las percepciones de docentes y estudiantes sobre las acciones del buen retorno escolar en el área de Inglés 2022, en el contexto de la COVID-19 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26598
Carrasco, A., Coincidencias y diferencias en las percepciones de docentes y estudiantes sobre las acciones del buen retorno escolar en el área de Inglés 2022, en el contexto de la COVID-19 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26598
@mastersthesis{renati/537896,
title = "Coincidencias y diferencias en las percepciones de docentes y estudiantes sobre las acciones del buen retorno escolar en el área de Inglés 2022, en el contexto de la COVID-19",
author = "Carrasco Bonilla, Anyela Marilú",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The main objective of this research was to analyze the similarities and differences in the perceptions of teachers and 5th-grade students regarding the actions for a successful return to school in the English subject, in two public schools in Chiclayo in 2022, in the context of COVID-19. The study investigated the effectiveness of learning recovery actions, taking into account the materials provided by teachers through the recovery folder and the time utilized by students during the recovery process. Furthermore, the effectiveness of learning consolidation actions was explored through diagnostic evaluation and the activities carried out by students to ensure their acquired knowledge. Additionally, the study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of continuity actions in learning and the learning situation of the students. The research was conducted using a qualitative approach, employing an evaluative case study method to compare the similarities and differences in perceptions among four secondary school teachers and six students regarding the actions for a successful return to school and their effectiveness in the context of school closures caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. Two instruments were developed to collect the information: a semi-structured interview script and a focus group script. Subsequently, the collected information was organized in matrices to identify the most relevant findings. Finally, it is concluded that teachers and students agree that the time allocated for learning recovery has been insufficient. The narratives present differences regarding the effectiveness of diagnostic evaluation; for the teachers, it was an input for the consolidating learning, and for the majority of students this did not happen because they did not even receive the results of that evaluation.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License