Bibliographic citations
Sánchez, C., (2022). ¿Deben necesariamente ponderar los jueces al ejercer control difuso? Crítica a la consulta 1618-2016-Lima Norte [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22061
Sánchez, C., ¿Deben necesariamente ponderar los jueces al ejercer control difuso? Crítica a la consulta 1618-2016-Lima Norte []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/22061
@misc{renati/534308,
title = "¿Deben necesariamente ponderar los jueces al ejercer control difuso? Crítica a la consulta 1618-2016-Lima Norte",
author = "Sánchez Pérez, Christian Pavel",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
The present research aims to explain, through the dogmatic method, whether judges, when exercising diffuse control, must necessarily apply the proportionality test according to the mandates of the binding precedent, query Nro. 1618-2016-Lima Norte. Also; the application of the conflictivist theory of fundamental rights is explained, as well as the jurisprudential implication in diffuse control for peruvian law. It comes to the conclusion that, although weighting analysis is a constitutional global interpretation method, this is not the only one, so interpretive freedom must be prioritized, not forcing judges to reason in a single way. Even more, if there is no justification for this and there is a case-law vacuum of motivation with respect to the existence of another level of equal requirement for the approval of the statement that performs the diffuse control.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License