Bibliographic citations
Cabrejo, J., (2023). Gobierno corporativo en el marco de la responsabilidad social de las empresas: la importancia de los deberes fiduciarios y la regulación [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25128
Cabrejo, J., Gobierno corporativo en el marco de la responsabilidad social de las empresas: la importancia de los deberes fiduciarios y la regulación []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/25128
@phdthesis{renati/534181,
title = "Gobierno corporativo en el marco de la responsabilidad social de las empresas: la importancia de los deberes fiduciarios y la regulación",
author = "Cabrejo Villagarcía, José del Carmen",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The Thesis aims to qualitatively understand the relationship between Corporate Governance (CG) and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in corporate activity, extending this relationship as to the role of Fiduciary Duties and Regulation. The central hypothesis of the Thesis is that CG and CSR are instruments and vehicles of economic and social development arising from the corporate activity, considering at the base, the conception of corporations as team production entities, linked by a contractual nexus. In this mean, CG within the framework of CSR, is the direction and control system that aims to guide corporate resources for the value-creation to all members of the production team, the economy and the society in which they develop their economic activity and not only to their shareholders. Fiduciary Duties constitute the cornerstone of the legal phase of the direction and control of corporations, which can become a tool for economic and social development. The role of regulation is critical, and includes market, state, judicial, and mixed regulatory elements that empower the corporate gear. It is concluded that from the Theory of Market Economy and the Theories of the Nexus-of-Contractus and Team Production, CG within the framework of CSR, can be re-expressed in their private and public purpose. In Peru, it is possible to do so, thanks to various standards, entities, and self-regulation practices that cut across the corporate ecosystems. This re-expression includes the legal environment, somewhat tainted by the Private Property Theory and the Shareholder Paradigm of corporations.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License