Bibliographic citations
Arapa, A., (2022). Efectos de la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que declaró la inconstitucionalidad del artículo 46° de la Ley n° 27785, incorporado por la Ley n° 29622, respecto a la potestad sancionadora de la Contraloría General de la República [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/21808
Arapa, A., Efectos de la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que declaró la inconstitucionalidad del artículo 46° de la Ley n° 27785, incorporado por la Ley n° 29622, respecto a la potestad sancionadora de la Contraloría General de la República []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/21808
@misc{renati/532670,
title = "Efectos de la sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional que declaró la inconstitucionalidad del artículo 46° de la Ley n° 27785, incorporado por la Ley n° 29622, respecto a la potestad sancionadora de la Contraloría General de la República",
author = "Arapa Ambrocio, Alonso Martín",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This investigation includes an analysis of the effects that the declaration of unconstitutionality of Article 46 of Law No. 27785, issued by the Constitutional Court in File No. 00020-2015-PI / TC, has caused on the sanctioning capacity of the Government Accountability Office; as well as, to explore in a referential way the effects that the lack of exercise of the sanctioning capacity, has caused regarding the fight against corruption and functional misconduct; and, in turn, carry out a brief analysis of the arguments raised in the unconstitutionality claim against Law No. 31288, which question the new classification of the offending conducts. For this purpose, the research has resorted to the bibliographic, hemerographic, documentary, and normative consultation, as well as the search in internet resources, such as blogs and news. As conclusions of the investigation, it is necessary to say that despite the recognition of the sanctioning capacity of the Government Accountability Office, this Entity has not been able to sanction the public servants and officials who incurred in functional misconduct for more than two years; also, the administrative sanctioning procedures that were in process must have been concluded, due to the legal impossibility of continuing them; moreover, in the period of time in which the Government Accountability Office was unable to exercise its sanctioning capacity, thousands of public officials involved in functional misconduct have not been able to be sanctioned, causing damage to the Public Administration; and, in addition, the analysis of the new classification of the infractions introduced by the Constitutional Court, must be carried out on a case-by-case, and taking into account the definition of undetermined legal concepts and the indirect typing.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License