Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Murdoch, L., (2024). Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución No. 0066-2023/SEL-INDECOPI [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28604
Murdoch, L., Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución No. 0066-2023/SEL-INDECOPI []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28604
@misc{renati/532372,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución No. 0066-2023/SEL-INDECOPI",
author = "Murdoch Quijandría, Lucas",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
Title: Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución No. 0066-2023/SEL-INDECOPI
Authors(s): Murdoch Quijandría, Lucas
Advisor(s): Francia Acuña, Laura Isabel
Keywords: Instituto Nacional de Defensa de la Competencia y de la Protección de la Propiedad Intelectual (Perú); Burocracia--Perú; Derecho administrativo--Perú; Derecho constitucional--Perú
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 12-Aug-2024
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El presente informe jurídico tiene por objeto analizar la Resolución No. 0066-
2022/SEL-INDECOPI, emitida por la Sala Especializada en Eliminación de
Barreras Burocráticas, mediante la cual resolvió la denuncia interpuesta por
Telefónica del Perú S.A.A. contra la Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros por la
imposición de barreras burocráticas ilegales y/o carentes de razonabilidad.
Telefónica del Perú S.A.A. denunció la exigencia del cobro del Aporte por
Regulación del Osiptel utilizando la base de cálculo y las alícuotas establecidas
por la Presidencia del Consejo de Ministros, a través del Decreto Supremo No.
134-2021-PCM. La Sala Especializada en Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas
resolvió declarar improcedente la denuncia dado que consideró que las medidas
denunciadas no podrían constituir barreras burocráticas. Ello toda vez que se
habrían cuestionado elementos esenciales de un tributo, creado por norma de
rango legal, en ejercicio de la función legislativa.
Mediante el presente trabajo, se analizará lo resuelto en la Resolución No. 0066-
2022/SEL-INDECOPI, de conformidad con la normativa aplicable, los principales
antecedentes sobre la materia y la doctrina correspondiente.
Se concluirá que la Sala Especializada en Eliminación de Barreras Burocráticas
no efectuó un correcto análisis. Correspondía declarar improcedente el extremo
referido a la exigencia del cobro del Aporte por Regulación utilizando la base de
cálculo materializada en el Decreto Supremo 134-2021-PCM; y, por el contrario,
declarar fundado el extremo referido a la exigencia del cobro del Aporte por
Regulación utilizando las alícuotas materializadas en el Decreto Supremo 134-
2021-PCM.
The purpose of this legal report is to analyze Resolution No. 0066-2022/SELINDECOPI, issued by the Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers, by which it resolved the complaint filed by Telefónica del Perú S.A.A.A. against the Presidency of the Council of Ministers for the imposition of illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barriers. Telefónica del Perú S.A.A. questioned the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the calculation base and the aliquots established by the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, through Supreme Decree No. 134-2021-PCM. The Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers decided to declare the complaint inadmissible. It considered that the measures could not constitute bureaucratic barriers, since they were essential elements of a tax, created by a legal rule, in the exercise of the legislative function. This report will analyze Resolution No. 0066-2022/SEL-INDECOPI, in accordance with the applicable regulation, and the main precedents and doctrine on the matter. It will be concluded that the Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers did not carry out an accurate analysis. It was right to declare inadmissible the extreme regarding the questioning of the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the calculation basis materialized in Supreme Decree 134-2021-PCM. But it was wrong not to declare founded the questioning of the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the aliquots materialized in Supreme Decree 134- 2021-PCM.
The purpose of this legal report is to analyze Resolution No. 0066-2022/SELINDECOPI, issued by the Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers, by which it resolved the complaint filed by Telefónica del Perú S.A.A.A. against the Presidency of the Council of Ministers for the imposition of illegal and/or unreasonable bureaucratic barriers. Telefónica del Perú S.A.A. questioned the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the calculation base and the aliquots established by the Presidency of the Council of Ministers, through Supreme Decree No. 134-2021-PCM. The Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers decided to declare the complaint inadmissible. It considered that the measures could not constitute bureaucratic barriers, since they were essential elements of a tax, created by a legal rule, in the exercise of the legislative function. This report will analyze Resolution No. 0066-2022/SEL-INDECOPI, in accordance with the applicable regulation, and the main precedents and doctrine on the matter. It will be concluded that the Specialized Chamber for the Elimination of Bureaucratic Barriers did not carry out an accurate analysis. It was right to declare inadmissible the extreme regarding the questioning of the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the calculation basis materialized in Supreme Decree 134-2021-PCM. But it was wrong not to declare founded the questioning of the requirement of having to pay to Osiptel the Regulatory Contribution using the aliquots materialized in Supreme Decree 134- 2021-PCM.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28604
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Cairampoma Arroyo, Vicente Alberto; Francia Acuña, Laura Isabel; Martín Tirado, Richard James
Register date: 12-Aug-2024
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License