Bibliographic citations
This is an automatically generated citacion. Modify it if you see fit
Vivar, C., (2022). Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal Fiscal No.07308-2-2019 [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23050
Vivar, C., Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal Fiscal No.07308-2-2019 []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23050
@misc{renati/530932,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal Fiscal No.07308-2-2019",
author = "Vivar Rosales, Crhis Mattio",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
Title: Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución de observancia obligatoria del Tribunal Fiscal No.07308-2-2019
Authors(s): Vivar Rosales, Crhis Mattio
Advisor(s): Durán Rojo, Luis Alberto
OCDE field: https://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#5.05.01
Issue Date: 11-Aug-2022
Institution: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú
Abstract: El 24 de agosto de 2019 se emitió la Resolución de observancia obligatoria 07308-2-
2019 mediante la cual el Tribunal Fiscal fijo como criterio vinculante la imposibilidad
de controvertir una observación aceptada mediante una declaración jurada
rectificatoria. El presente informe jurídico contiene un análisis crítico de dicho criterio
basado en tres premisas: I) La declaración tributaria (rectificatoria) no constituye un
acto de determinación definitivo; II) la imposibilidad de reclamar una Resolución de
Determinación, pese a existir controversia tributaria, vulnera el derecho de defensa
del contribuyente y III) El Tribunal Fiscal supone equivocadamente que el
allanamiento tributario tiene asidero en nuestra normativa tributaria.
On August 24, 2019, Resolution of mandatory observance 07308-2-2019 was issued by which the Tax Court fixed as a binding criterion the impossibility to dispute an accepted tax observation through a rectifying tax affidavit. This legal report contains a critical analysis of such criterion based on three premises: I) The (rectifying) tax affidavit does not constitute a definitive determination; II) the impossibility of claiming a Determination Resolution, despite the existence of a tax controversy, violates the taxpayer's right of defense and III) The Tax Court points out wrongly that the objections acceptance is supported by our tax regulation.
On August 24, 2019, Resolution of mandatory observance 07308-2-2019 was issued by which the Tax Court fixed as a binding criterion the impossibility to dispute an accepted tax observation through a rectifying tax affidavit. This legal report contains a critical analysis of such criterion based on three premises: I) The (rectifying) tax affidavit does not constitute a definitive determination; II) the impossibility of claiming a Determination Resolution, despite the existence of a tax controversy, violates the taxpayer's right of defense and III) The Tax Court points out wrongly that the objections acceptance is supported by our tax regulation.
Link to repository: http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23050
Discipline: Derecho
Grade or title grantor: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú. Facultad de Derecho.
Grade or title: Abogado
Juror: Sevillano Chávez, Sandra Mariela; Durán Rojo, Luis Alberto; Adriazola Burga, Stephanie Alexa
Register date: 11-Aug-2022
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License