Bibliographic citations
Rodriguez, S., (2024). El derecho a la defensa en la imputación de sanciones disciplinarias distintas al despido [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27785
Rodriguez, S., El derecho a la defensa en la imputación de sanciones disciplinarias distintas al despido [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27785
@misc{renati/530848,
title = "El derecho a la defensa en la imputación de sanciones disciplinarias distintas al despido",
author = "Rodriguez Asencios, Sergio Enrique",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The purpose of this academic work is to make a critical and empirical analysis of the lack of regulation of procedures to impose disciplinary sanctions other than dismissal. Under this approach, the nature of written reprimands and suspension without pay are analyzed as the main disciplinary measures imposed by the employer to punish employees, which do not have a procedure regulated by law unlike dismissal for just cause. In this way, a need for regulation is evident in the face of the possible impact on the right to defense, which is proven every time that employers do not establish a procedure for employees to issue their defenses after receiving an accusation for the alleged commission of a crime. infraction or fault that contravenes an obligation within the framework of the employment relationship. This work highlights the need to regulate this legislative vacuum based on the experiences of employees in Peru, as well as the regulatory treatment in Comparative Law. For these reasons, in the absence of regulation in Peru, a legislative proposal is proposed to guarantee the right to defense in disciplinary sanction procedures other than dismissal.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License