Bibliographic citations
Barco, G., (2024). Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 19 contenida en el Expediente 18478-2008-0-1801-JR-CA-05: Sobre la imposición de multas coercitivas por parte de Osinergmin [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28434
Barco, G., Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 19 contenida en el Expediente 18478-2008-0-1801-JR-CA-05: Sobre la imposición de multas coercitivas por parte de Osinergmin []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/28434
@misc{renati/530208,
title = "Informe jurídico sobre la Resolución N° 19 contenida en el Expediente 18478-2008-0-1801-JR-CA-05: Sobre la imposición de multas coercitivas por parte de Osinergmin",
author = "Barco Hidalgo, Gino Leonardo Miguel",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
The purpose of this legal report is to determine whether the Public Administration, specifically the regulatory entity Osinergmin, has the authority to apply enforcement mechanisms to ensure compliance with resolutions issued within the framework of a trilateral administrative procedure. In this context, the contentious-administrative case contained in judicial file 18478-2008-0-1801-JRCA- 05 will be analyzed, with particular emphasis on Resolution N° 19 - Judgment of Appeal, which changed the focus of the Court by erroneously determining that the regulatory body has the power to impose coercive fines in trilateral proceedings. In response to this, reference will be made to the current regulations governing the application of coercive fines against the electricity concessionaire Electronoroeste S.A., as well as specialized doctrine, to demonstrate that Osinergmin did not act in accordance with the law. To prove this, it will first be established that although the regulatory body had the authority to impose coercive fines, the law limits this authority to cases where the obligations contained in the resolutions benefit the entity. Additionally, it will be clarified that the procedure for user claims is indeed trilateral when an appeal is filed. Finally, there will be a reflection on the lack of administrative avenues through which the Administration can exercise its power of self-guardianship; however, this does not imply that it should not act in accordance with the law.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License