Bibliographic citations
Yanayaco, L., (2024). El nuevo criterio adoptado por el Indecopi respecto del despliegue de todas las medidas de seguridad contenidas en la norma sectorial y la vulneración a la figura de improcedencia por subsanación previa en la aplicación de este criterio, a la luz de la Resolución N° 2616-2022/SPC-INDECOPI [Trabajo académico, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27455
Yanayaco, L., El nuevo criterio adoptado por el Indecopi respecto del despliegue de todas las medidas de seguridad contenidas en la norma sectorial y la vulneración a la figura de improcedencia por subsanación previa en la aplicación de este criterio, a la luz de la Resolución N° 2616-2022/SPC-INDECOPI [Trabajo académico]. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2024. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/27455
@misc{renati/529532,
title = "El nuevo criterio adoptado por el Indecopi respecto del despliegue de todas las medidas de seguridad contenidas en la norma sectorial y la vulneración a la figura de improcedencia por subsanación previa en la aplicación de este criterio, a la luz de la Resolución N° 2616-2022/SPC-INDECOPI",
author = "Yanayaco Arias, Liliana Andrea",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2024"
}
This research work will reveal the new criteria adopted by Indecopi, regarding the deployment of all the security measures contained in Resolution No. 6523-2013. However, currently Indecopi is using this new one, intending to nullify the application of the inadmissibility of the accusations in cases of voluntary correction of the infraction prior to the imputation of charge (Legislative Decree No. 1308º that modifies the Code of Consumer Protection and Defense). In this regard, it is necessary to take into consideration that the aforementioned regulatory body limits the sanctioning power of Indecopi, as a state entity in charge of safeguarding and ensuring the protection of consumers, in cases in which the inadmissibility of the complaint is evident. , understood as the absence of legal justification to issue substantive pronouncements on the controversial matter. In this sense, as will be developed in this work, it will be evident that the Commission is not following a clear line in the analysis of the duty of monitoring when financial consumers report alleged unrecognized operations, violating the purpose of the inadmissibility contemplated in the Legislative Decree No. 1308, which modifies the Consumer Protection and Defense Code, being used in cases in which, due to partial inadmissibility, the administrative power of Indecopi to rule on the merits of the controversial matter is prevented and/or extinguished.
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.