Bibliographic citations
Gonzales, M., (2022). Informe Jurídico sobre la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional en el Expediente N° 06040-2015-AA: Caso Ana Romero [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23018
Gonzales, M., Informe Jurídico sobre la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional en el Expediente N° 06040-2015-AA: Caso Ana Romero []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2022. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/23018
@misc{renati/529508,
title = "Informe Jurídico sobre la Sentencia del Tribunal Constitucional en el Expediente N° 06040-2015-AA: Caso Ana Romero",
author = "Gonzales Usquiano, Marisol Edith",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2022"
}
This paper addresses the critical analysis of Ana Romero's case through the judgment of Exp. No. 06040-2015-AA, which arises from the problem of the recognition of the right to identity in the case of trans people. Given that in Peru the change of sex and name has been made effective through the judicial process, an analysis of the resolutive grounds outlined by the Peruvian Constitutional Court is proposed. In this sense, the contradiction between these grounds and the argumentative construction of the Court will be shown, which ended up moving away from a more guaranteeing decision and opted to choose a more conservative one in the process. Likewise, the criticism of the suitability of equally satisfactory ways, indicated by the Court and the intrinsic link between the Public Administration and constitutional justice, in the active role of protection of fundamental rights, will be reflected; which, as we will see, RENIEC intends to ignore. For all these reasons, the Trans Identity Law is proposed as the necessary tool to consider the suitability and protection of the right alleged by the appellant, in light of the comparative experience in Chile, Argentina, Bolivia and Uruguay.
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License