Bibliographic citations
Serrano, L., (2023). Una cura para la omisión de pronunciamiento en sentencias de primera instancia en el proceso civil peruano: Entre la integración y la nulidad [Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú]. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26597
Serrano, L., Una cura para la omisión de pronunciamiento en sentencias de primera instancia en el proceso civil peruano: Entre la integración y la nulidad []. PE: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú; 2023. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12404/26597
@misc{renati/528754,
title = "Una cura para la omisión de pronunciamiento en sentencias de primera instancia en el proceso civil peruano: Entre la integración y la nulidad",
author = "Serrano Arostegui, Ligia Zamira",
publisher = "Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú",
year = "2023"
}
The Peruvian Civil Procedure Code provides two legal remedies to rectify situations where the judge has omitted a decision in a first-instance judgment: annulment and integration. However, the legal norms that govern these remedies are deficient, leading to an overuse of annulment. To address this issue, a dogmatic analysis of the legal norms governing nullity and integration has been conducted to determine the appropriate application of each remedy. The analysis has revealed that two factors influence primarily this decision: (i) the extent of the omission in the first instance judgment, whether it is partial or total, and (ii) the jurisdictional body responsible for remedying it, whether it is the judge who issued the sentence (a quo) or the appeal judge (ad quem).
This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License